Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966058AbWKXTgW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:36:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966062AbWKXTgW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:36:22 -0500 Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.104]:7082 "HELO smtp101.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S966058AbWKXTgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:36:21 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PcTGHVGbQ8qSdh1yWBNNC9QEoZEsY7xKdl5voHeq02vTrcV1PIz4skg+Tyt+IggcJFX5j0GRIeKG/gTcyydllyRfiTN2/dWQRkuW0fNw08m5FRhAKNrzrDx/miLbG1D/C18lue4+zVWCTYRLGno0Y0KTNB6dgvr/KesdLSPsq+M= ; X-YMail-OSG: uJOtgkQVM1mhiY5N0A5zU3VFI8IwbV93XVphNr6fatru9pw9lecjIEgS_F2SVUE8gRPwa3im4bE4uDJBbsA96f9cduSa_pJVyAep5oIDKospzTNYVwEhbA-- Message-ID: <45674952.8020007@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:34:42 -0600 From: Matthew Frost Reply-To: artusemrys@sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Whitcroft CC: Andrew Morton , Mariusz Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 References: <20061123021703.8550e37e.akpm@osdl.org> <200611231223.48703.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> <20061123103607.af7ae8b0.akpm@osdl.org> <45660298.3090003@shadowen.org> In-Reply-To: <45660298.3090003@shadowen.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2230 Lines: 58 Andy Whitcroft wrote: > I get this accross the board on my test system too. All clean downloads. > > A quick look at the combo-patch and the broken-out patch seems to > indicate they are not in sync with each other. In the combo-patch we > have this hunk (which is the one which fails): > > --- linux-2.6.19-rc6/kernel/tsacct.c 2006-11-16 23:19:32.000000000 -0800 > +++ devel/kernel/tsacct.c 2006-11-23 01:12:17.000000000 -0800 > @@ -97,7 +97,14 @@ void xacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *sta > stats->read_syscalls = p->syscr; > stats->write_syscalls = p->syscw; > #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING > - stats->read_bytes = p->ioac->read_bytes > + stats->read_bytes = p->ioac.read_bytes; > + stats->write_bytes = p->ioac.write_bytes; > + stats->cancelled_write_bytes = p->ioac.cancelled_write_bytes; > +#else > + stats->read_bytes = 0; > + stats->write_bytes = 0; > + stats->cancelled_write_bytes = 0; > +#endif > > In the broken-out directory the only patch which references this file > has the following different hunk: > > --- a/kernel/tsacct.c~io-accounting-via-taskstats > +++ a/kernel/tsacct.c > @@ -96,6 +96,15 @@ void xacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *sta > stats->write_char = 0; > stats->read_syscalls = p->syscr; > stats->write_syscalls = p->syscw; > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING > + stats->read_bytes = p->ioac.read_bytes; > + stats->write_bytes = p->ioac.write_bytes; > + stats->cancelled_write_bytes = p->ioac.cancelled_write_bytes; > +#else > + stats->read_bytes = 0; > + stats->write_bytes = 0; > + stats->cancelled_write_bytes = 0; > +#endif > } > #undef KB > #undef MB > > Looking at 2.6.19-rc6 this second version seems completely reasonable. > The former does not. > Swapping out those two hunks makes the patch apply cleanly here, too. Thanks! > -apw > Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/