Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:08:10 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] dt-bindings: net: fsl,fec: add RGMII
 internal clock delay
Message-ID: <YQFkysjHFEN1w6Yz@lunn.ch>
References: <20210728115203.16263-1-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
 <20210728115203.16263-3-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210728115203.16263-3-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 07:51:58PM +0800, Joakim Zhang wrote:

> +      The "enet_2x_txclk"(option), for RGMII sampling clock which fixed at 250Mhz.
> +      The clock is required if SoC RGMII enable clock delay.

Hi Joakim

So you only need the clock if you are using RGMII delays? For RGMII
without delays, the clock is not needed?

You might want to add a check in the C code that the clock is provided
when needed.

     Andrew