Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5292356pxv; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVRtyaUwOG4y+FSX2uITaLOD4VGI0L4H+R7y2BMJKaV3AdSyIpeUoSS/1amLo/0kLx6UxE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:16c1:: with SMTP id t1mr14303763ejd.45.1627482794791; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627482794; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qGqzXlj1/mE4PuQVwjmMU+GysHroavcBNKF/twOHt7MinBX6WVeqFBZEJ4G1JdYhec 7YcF73bRNlNd8ZUuBXtQbLzpELb9P1nq1C2q1eQeochEFuZyfaCvyf+7fL9PoP5/cBj7 xjiqYSzuBnxErkf3CGPX9r7V1zmMHqkWrJM5cVb4673Uhf5cnlik4zMAKV78iPTm38ES wuH89Y7ZJqMLV/hJvrs08fsERtf85dbDvo7b0ZZpIUUwVL0oNXMO7Fthm1RXaPMdDZ4s YOi8saWMfCUi+rEEfGublDhA44C4fvz/rkpZ+JFwHTR5wPfeUrdwyZQE+KcFf0snqtlI 3SVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EWMhKuhzY0FJ+mWkwxQDUPoUI1dXhEccFhu84g2EBLw=; b=EnkJXlrSDUsdIHVHTSoeo5aPOqdB22MfP9/EHZ+C7GbaZqAis6E19Zun247fHDaa6q FSgiFvTXAIxZoa5FHmOT5iVUXJ6Vi++qZWFZJvyX+plg/uhUegPPNummQlvzSt0ma2DB x8RrKBKjIJH3Lnix9J4sEYInU1JIHOtTMeH1e87g7J9/HQknARgIVoDt3xMtk8KgWQoM 3eE0CC2TbqwnC2HzRe326lt/zegz/sm745dqAvqidOYWQzi6f6y5zIZsUgQ5NtXpGo5t SWJHIjD5UVR7TfCpdb3pj9gY1AWuejcos//vhT58eEJ3kM8XrXl4seJffjIshmMntyfj kZbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y11si6022363eds.512.2021.07.28.07.32.50; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236686AbhG1Obc (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:31:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:57756 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237379AbhG1O1r (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:27:47 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B181042; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.37.191]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA7583F70D; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:26:25 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com, Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback Message-ID: <20210728142625.zbx7zbeffwsksjl5@bogus> References: <20210712141833.6628-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210712141833.6628-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210712141833.6628-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Add a new opaque void *priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback which can be > optionally provided by the transport layer when invoking scmi_rx_callback > and that will be passed back to the transport layer in xfer->priv. > > This can be used by transports that needs to keep track of their specific > data structures together with the valid xfers. > This change looks simple but doesn't make sense on its own. I assume you don't want to add all these in the patch making use of priv which makes sense. Not sure if the next patch uses it, but I prefer to keep them as close as possible if it is not too much of a hassle. -- Regards, Sudeep