Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5384839pxv; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:28:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyREQK1OYmoYDm4BJ7a4U7SO3vEeoRLAP0tOm76waeUMYX4g6iuSIGCtikbD0QxtmHXv5Fz X-Received: by 2002:a92:1908:: with SMTP id 8mr435645ilz.149.1627489739571; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:28:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627489739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Hjsqum0h6sI8L0YzKbJnfEd2wctFsvSev03kq5ZFQx7C/udcJd5xPHhY7Ma9Vkh79c GDnerKiJFeCu/5pqONDZmFhNzTTciiK/yHESP4MynebClqFNlW+oMyobdVJA1LJ/oNza WLZSuRJ0lbjFuKWa82FVYzJzNWaAbs5kMzPJdsNYI/dpWvkIgBmkIde7R7Qki6okfdDt h5I04CGqGW1HuYahB0zTEzvWgjEydhMolsfaiOi29bZzpSDDZ8WuJEIeKyXrvXf1qh8w ki2Ks9453Y7408JYfffW2dxvwCUyD5PynGSQcnj/eSHdUXKjuXgHVS6L7NbrF+8wwUIo LOQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=GOEYhGPYQ4YUbo4gftj4JX0Uz5V/Qj9S6dris+AXSaA=; b=xFElkjSOOn0JHwICIZDkIaNO6mmgnXVvxyqSSY++DGiWpNhhdnDQvnnRb3l5OEH05r EJRYvEv23KYzolpMxRmFKzrRIa3+qf/DA1YsdxphkYkpaSrXMPcG+QL8f0nZHP0QiS9t 9p0LT5M0e55mgCQtyslK+b8O8SjqbjJgqd4rY8ilxTNtBL99pQeFMoyB8LJgv0DXyXDR bOymltqwmfSQGYSusE5uqsFE3MQOrVPWXqpORDamSCbEYIZc653957+rTAqZh4EVS7VX BF2UcXVer1657vLVcYYZTH4D4hjKJf13FR9XTAy/dnNq1lZBEXvWhp32GSjL20oL2fDP lR6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=LxjG3gFI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y16si237349ilm.7.2021.07.28.09.28.48; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=LxjG3gFI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229681AbhG1Q17 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:27:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38558 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229501AbhG1Q16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:27:58 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7B1C061757; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.tnic (unknown [109.121.183.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8F24F1EC0527; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:27:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1627489669; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=GOEYhGPYQ4YUbo4gftj4JX0Uz5V/Qj9S6dris+AXSaA=; b=LxjG3gFIJCDuOQDGzY+hiG0vN+dfpBr7Vq5w2ORdpOETiJfx6X9JMDFJJMxIan0ujoNNw7 KMi/vJ5Nq5Vi/Nq5x7JcXDHRAXe8ptcsnGwT9j1ZZa1hhOAXVDNeta9RonTrMrxsR3lvLV KIVjknjki6FEc0QGw1JCe7AU529aFu0= Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:28:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Tianyu Lan , Brijesh Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:17:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > So common checks obviously make sense, but I really hate the stupid > multiplexer. Having one well-documented helper per feature is much > easier to follow. We had that in x86 - it was called cpu_has_ where xxx is the feature bit. It didn't scale with the sheer amount of feature bits that kept getting added so we do cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XXX) now. The idea behind this is very similar - those protected guest flags will only grow in the couple of tens range - at least - so having a multiplexer is a lot simpler, I'd say, than having a couple of tens of helpers. And those PATTR flags should have good, readable names, btw. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette