Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5548786pxv; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:27:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxT9FODMWZz1vTnmETN+NP7TDvRyXCD7R3K4oh2nVSrPEybxJAmuQ10qA19m0PTPV0Dyq0b X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e602:: with SMTP id g2mr1007404ioh.50.1627504040816; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:27:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627504040; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1F0FRYI0xif+udBDZOAtFxpZH/NrVmzQU/bGVozj2DvOsywtttf4ijwnklnWgfjZrb RWhTUFpoct8DNIYH7EBVD1uiXmtInil5ARkkuRiaXTYeip1xLOLEQJ1CirHZDlG5NDZQ GXXZwGbaylGvIykozfGwsil7vI709rRzebjPYWCF/19exSWFhX5JchKz42H/CklG4Vev 8ByNkJ6e+rosOt8u8tsBLMcShHGjnvVV7m+RyEpyC3z7vykzaQTrP9IItY6MXvKhEY/s 7E7j6/8QFdEKcbcZJGH7bv9k53RY1/ZsSkynU2b35LjaDt43ixWrvXEEeQE37xGcUHnp D7vQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=gLiwylcgpA5WP5wI3tojnvNgdcCCh5mzg/V5fwTuTCs=; b=WtAmk+to5/KNq9Z5qbnTSPdepJli8xJ4bbJHSu0SnThgkfWjfR780zhdvy/N+lb5ZG iuUHHS1hqgP8vdRdSNOgQ0VttKEHJF+2QbsWpwEAnQVZjYgW6ip4bVunv/D0f9fYRDc8 ewg/RUrZ7NaTQagtjxlh8PZvBrtRnUAygR6mq+rIWKxcnM2zZQ1pnoNdpEE/cgx5fKx1 n8Bv0pz3hrZEtJh9J3heZ+mag+TLh2ZPufzrQKdb0G9KWrYt9PVVQW9QPxzeIpbeDodQ 7HUmVaGwueuBR7xQpeovsQg3mKqF94KugKcIjy5edPWX1MUbRuU7i/CyIwZaPDzqoJtD 4gwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="F3T/qYya"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si631314ilq.3.2021.07.28.13.27.09; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="F3T/qYya"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231370AbhG1UZR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:25:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53752 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231268AbhG1UZR (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:25:17 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B542160F12; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:25:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1627503915; bh=A091a54c0uUiNdEa4DyZyzmh4FRgXhjsONTrLRgO6dU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=F3T/qYyarYoOhflabSANAGrX1x6WIiO7qAAAn9kSiZkJBGedQh+Rx1XL2qOTJMX27 V5Vkp8hEUBlf2mAb4cD7eoLEGHNRrbSNKUPG/hWCzDyfY8nMihNVaYVYSJgSpn9rHl zUfDGZZWoI2Gbzp6ccHlLALnSe+MzSiBIRm4NPsf/XSrTnoCPtwW/2l+mlqsGQHD4N iyjFEOFR7F9844Y4Ir2d7feowZ7SBwkgOqfrU6XmGGTKLxW2tV3Pc5wwXXS27jZ5O3 SvwMIyCtXZkWv2LpO+swwb6ySF1SO8ks4tnELfgugjMaNCJWG63X/WYqISslkLwadp fQQBs7B/L7khA== Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:25:13 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Shanker R Donthineni Cc: Amey Narkhede , Bjorn Helgaas , alex.williamson@redhat.com, Raphael Norwitz , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kw@linux.com, Sinan Kaya , Len Brown , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] PCI: Add new array for keeping track of ordering of reset methods Message-ID: <20210728202513.GA848092@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:19PM -0500, Shanker R Donthineni wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On 7/27/21 5:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > >> index fefa6d7b3..42440cb10 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > >> @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ static void pci_dev_d3_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> msleep(delay); > >> } > >> > >> +int pci_reset_supported(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> +{ > >> + u8 null_reset_methods[PCI_NUM_RESET_METHODS] = { 0 }; > >> + > >> + return memcmp(null_reset_methods, > >> + dev->reset_methods, sizeof(null_reset_methods)); > > I think "return dev->reset_methods[0] != 0;" is sufficient, isn't it? > > > > Agree with you, it simplifies code logic and can be moved to > "include/linux/pci.h" with inline definition. Can we change return > type to 'bool' instead of 'int' ? Does it need to be exported to drivers? Looks like it's only used inside drivers/pci/, so it shouldn't be in include/linux/pci.h. Making it bool is fine with me. > static inline bool pci_reset_supported(struct pci_dev *dev) > {?? > ??? return !!dev->reset_methods[0]; > } >