Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:25:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:25:23 -0500 Received: from mx2out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.52]:25992 "EHLO mx2out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:25:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:24:59 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: Andreas Boman cc: , Subject: Re: Athlon SMP blues - kernels 2.4.[9 13 15-pre4] In-Reply-To: <20011114101347.272f6b88.aboman@nerdfest.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Andreas Boman wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Ehm you know that XP cpu's don't support SMP configuration ? > > _Officially_. However afaik the XP cpu's are identical to the MP ones. All > AMD K7 cpu's 'work' in SMP. www.2cpu.com (I think?) had a discussion on this relatively recently. For the moment, the only difference between MP and XP chips appears to be that the MP chips are more easily unlocked for overclocking, if I recall the article correctly. So, I doubt that the original posters problems are because he's using XP chips. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/