Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:30:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:30:31 -0500 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:29456 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:30:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:30:16 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.x has finally made it! Message-ID: <20011114163016.B2976@ralph.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011113171836.A14967@emma1.emma.line.org> <20011113174250.A15774@emma1.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Doug McNaught wrote: > > Well, he wanted to benchmark everyday use, and disk latency is also an > > issue for everyday use, of course; > > But it's more a measure of your disk subsystem than your VM efficiency > (unless something is badly wrong). The matters are: - "everyday use" (go with fsync() for mail) - how good does VM cope with - say - "priority write" actions like fsync()? -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/