Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967213AbWKYV2s (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:28:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S967214AbWKYV2s (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:28:48 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:10989 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967213AbWKYV2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:28:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:26:51 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Miller cc: samuel@sortiz.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, irda-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, arvidjaar@mail.ru, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "[IRDA]: Lockdep fix." In-Reply-To: <20061125.130927.87744078.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20061125152649.GA5698@sortiz.org> <20061125.130927.87744078.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 27 On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, David Miller wrote: > > Why is everyone so impatient about this issue? Just wait for Andrew > to merge the fix and all will be well :-) No, I think this was a total failure. We should have reverted it immediately rather than waiting for the fix. Especially as the damn thing wasn't even all that important. I now (finally) have the patch from Andrew, but we should _not_ have had this thing broken for three days. It should have gotten reverted on the first report of trouble, instead of us telling people to just wait. Broken compiles are simply not acceptable. Patches that cause them should be reverted _immediately_ unless a fix is available as quickly (which it wasn't due to turkey-day). No excuses. People _should_ be impatient about idiotic failures like this. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/