Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp6271694pxv; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSW/b8Hwkrkdhy2yTdN55IrPNYjkr5nZ8gzGlmx/MXLMSDYFdNLdmx+my2UreTBF95e5B2 X-Received: by 2002:a92:cec5:: with SMTP id z5mr4164929ilq.226.1627579129075; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627579129; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TjWmZn7O2PFb2PHV1yl/sucig6TsT/v2OH0skPD/gIraBJ3AWcLU0f8+KYKvqG7yta xpl8ksK04GSgz4Tvc9dx8znBRKlWP8WYDB+bcyesP2yXQ1drZDf/NmxQcmtA5b2bbeRA YTdjOnfOelMw59DsoKHgb2R3l+ixg1NUJZtVcyLCA7kz0xxFmkXeo0AWQOQSZq6i8ktx E0I9XyAscwgj1U/IWSCbtIKjGZ51Tecaw23hd4K7rWa7pP51q648BOL1De+7hy8GzD81 Hmxej8kt5K/JDnGU54n6ufJTcmaVejiB8hpU0F/I82EXku2/AecR47Y80z1yFT5kHmrU X2fQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=uUAEdvE4SzIJpqzGhe66vfb/gL75mbbFYOZDgNw6wcc=; b=BbLjTert1Ns2GlAYt2SFynAkjI34J7dCkHKFqd0ZlxBc/rIIOyMR/TbQmpI2u8v+5r 6DrFvBTwyyQD4d2kDbkmOuLllrEmv31XV0NyKpZRVF9qNbXIakSpGw2t4lZBtEq9ccOm N0F0zYXDuPKFzBH2ReOFr2dYzObqviapDRAVeAihm3RC51nzQ8k/jgsNrLp9SyTiVKVF 2NFnqNpt9GmeiN5DJgXd5EPsDzk4Fj2SiyVkva1DpIBSqYrCf7azYebXcaEnKFWQNH7E GbFdJYUZP+WgDOSQMLFqVAC3OZQcTFcNxmBiIWLK6/jtcp/+2rwIe4zZuW/EixTY3rjz HQIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=TG4ILWTF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l6si2289441ios.26.2021.07.29.10.18.35; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=TG4ILWTF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231183AbhG2RRY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:17:24 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47682 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229863AbhG2RRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:17:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1627579038; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uUAEdvE4SzIJpqzGhe66vfb/gL75mbbFYOZDgNw6wcc=; b=TG4ILWTFkSV5PuTh6vum7lQudA4muDx8e5Je+BVQS+hP/yktea8IX577682L4WGQ9/7Ugu OG2BJ4D322fvUm4cMzCja368eKyg5xFj/adOhxD2NHpwhyVe9oCwBVYEghC8ZqSNRXCTUd s+ows9O9wEXBXjLy2/443PTkdf0xVz0= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-141-dO6fH-TIO3ytXZvwzgAIWg-1; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:17:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dO6fH-TIO3ytXZvwzgAIWg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id s22-20020adf97960000b02901535eae4100so2458730wrb.14 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uUAEdvE4SzIJpqzGhe66vfb/gL75mbbFYOZDgNw6wcc=; b=oIWQpgsHr8+rGLw9J5EiO14zsrYtatjMEIJeh2UspxgOm2J5WQ+qeAmD2ytxzJQeUm ASOsW5m0LXrydH8uapNZMkvc302NSyh3sHbdnpMCVnZ34/yKlSp9YAcnS2kgOoWQcON7 U2xbNAh58MhdnprkTEHFNiK5rW8630oqSADBvgmEw0Q5dXo5ctclb6VN8cSyYmXPAhMa 8dmhSq2XwDh3XY14df4V8KEs19vXEg2ReZ4pRodpLAi1kLv+ifJSQbXTl/KZwbZMlUW5 abP90Ls3VGOZbuDtvBtGHdZ7nGgGs8Tb16KfKjFmsE6Ome/Je3nPqrwidSeK1+nd++lH MC7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53025Crfwzd39WR4OBiCU58lQ5klu3u65txuUOFcGpLqt3rEB814 kCwm6+gGfFpZz1FqKZFph6Tp/6Lu1hp0HUsm57nhB7DJn3te8exUJ4gzmNcDHTi94Zjvt16Otjz J/BeKe9XJH+RvdGumcflJA5dQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f90:: with SMTP id n16mr5900750wmq.71.1627579035917; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f90:: with SMTP id n16mr5900731wmq.71.1627579035752; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm9533062wmb.35.2021.07.29.10.17.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86/mmu: simplify argument to kvm page fault handler To: David Matlack , Isaku Yamahata Cc: Sean Christopherson , Isaku Yamahata , kvm list , LKML , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson References: <936b00e2-1bcc-d5cc-5ae1-59f43ab5325f@redhat.com> <20210610220056.GA642297@private.email.ne.jp> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <92ffcffb-74c1-1876-fe86-a47553a2aa5b@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:17:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/07/21 18:48, David Matlack wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:05 PM Isaku Yamahata wrote: >> >> Thanks for feedback. Let me respin it. > > Hi Isaku, > > I'm working on a series to plumb the memslot backing the faulting gfn > through the page fault handling stack to avoid redundant lookups. This > would be much cleaner to implement on top of your struct > kvm_page_fault series than the existing code. > > Are you still planning to send another version of this series? Or if > you have decided to drop it or go in a different direction? I can work on this and post updated patches next week. Paolo