Subject: Re: Overriding X on panic
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin@ncsu.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20061125161043.18f1b68d@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1164434093.10503.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1164443561.3147.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	 <20061125161043.18f1b68d@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Intel International BV
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:18:41 +0100
Message-Id: <1164529121.3147.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 886
Lines: 22

On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 16:10 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > modesettings to use can still be in userspace, the execution of the
> > series of IO's would be in the kernel, and the kernel would store
> > bundles of settings, including a "rescue" one, but also for
> > suspend/resume...
> 
> The mode switch sequences for modern cards are a bit more hairy than
> lists of I/O poking unfortunately. 

for the Intel hw Keith doesn't seem to think it's all that much of a
problem though...


-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/