Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935320AbWKZKXN (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:23:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935321AbWKZKXN (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:23:13 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:44957 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935320AbWKZKXM (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:23:12 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:13:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel , Alan , Pavel Machek References: <45693E25.9010504@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <45693E25.9010504@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611261113.12826.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1657 Lines: 43 On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:11, Robert Hancock wrote: > Alan wrote: > > Lots of other controllers don't work correctly on resume but thats much > > less of a problem and with UDMA misclocking generally turns into a CRC > > error storm and stop. > > > > Andrew has about 2/3rds of the bits I've done now, will push the rest > > when I've done a little more testing/checking. At that point libata ought > > to be resume safe. Someone who cares about drivers/ide legacy support can > > then copy the work over. > > btw, I have some code almost ready for sata_nv to add proper > suspend/resume support. Unfortunately I have trouble testing it, since > STR doesn't work on my machine since, guess what - the video doesn't > come back! It doesn't even take the monitor out of standby mode. None of > the acpi_sleep options seem to work, and vbetool appears to helpfully > segfault on any operation so that's out. I guess it's x86-64? Which version of vbetool? > This is an NVIDIA SLI setup so that probably makes things a bit more > complicated. Ouch. > In any case, it should be better than what we have right now for > suspend/resume support in sata_nv, namely the "do nothing, won't work > (at least not for CK804 and later)" implementation.. I think I can test it if you send me the patch. Greetings, Rafael -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/