Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:22:13 +0000
From: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin@ncsu.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Overriding X on panic
Message-ID: <20061126142213.52c292d3@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1164529121.3147.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
References: <1164434093.10503.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1164443561.3147.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	<20061125161043.18f1b68d@localhost.localdomain>
	<1164529121.3147.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 706
Lines: 18

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:18:41 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > The mode switch sequences for modern cards are a bit more hairy than
> > lists of I/O poking unfortunately. 
> 
> for the Intel hw Keith doesn't seem to think it's all that much of a
> problem though...

Including the TV out, odder LCD panels, non BIOS modes etc ? If so then
it might be an interesting test case for intelfb to grow some kind of
console helper interface

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/