Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935564AbWKZUw4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:52:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935565AbWKZUw4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:52:56 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:19077 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935564AbWKZUwz (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:52:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:52:35 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , seife@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND Message-ID: <20061126205235.GA13647@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200611190320_MC3-1-D21B-111C@compuserve.com> <20061122152328.GI5200@stusta.de> <20061122154230.74889e3d@localhost.localdomain> <20061124234015.GB4782@ucw.cz> <20061125160821.1fd4f9c8@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061125160821.1fd4f9c8@localhost.localdomain> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1549 Lines: 39 Hi! > > Hmm... how common are these machines? We are using unpatched kernel > > for suse10.2... OTOH we only support machines from the whitelist, all > > I've always said IDE and software suspend are unsafe. The more work I do > the more clearly this is/was the case. Well, there's unsafe as in "crashes", and that's unsafe as in "eats disks". > The really nasty "resume eats your disk" cases I know about are > thankfully for older systems - VIA KT133 and similar era chipsets. Aha, good. Hopefully noone has notebook with those. > There is a recent nasty - Jmicron goes totally to **** on resume because > of resume quirks not being run but it goes so spectacularly wrong it > doesn't seem to get far enough to corrupt. Good :-). Crashing is nasty, but we probably won't add that machine to whitelist. > Andrew has about 2/3rds of the bits I've done now, will push the rest > when I've done a little more testing/checking. At that point libata ought > to be resume safe. Someone who cares about drivers/ide legacy support can > then copy the work over. Thanks. I do not think we care about old mainboards enough to do 2.6.16-stable backport. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/