Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:48:30 -0700
From:   Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Balamurugan Selvarajan <balamsel@cisco.com>,
        xe-linux-external@cisco.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH] net: stmmac: Add KR port support.
Message-ID: <20210730144830.GO1633923@zorba>
References: <20210729234443.1713722-1-danielwa@cisco.com>
 <YQNrmB9XHkcGy5D0@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YQNrmB9XHkcGy5D0@lunn.ch>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 05:01:44AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:44:42PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > From: Balamurugan Selvarajan <balamsel@cisco.com>
> > 
> > For KR port the mii interface is a chip-to-chip
> > interface without a mechanical connector. So PHY
> > inits are not applicable. In this case MAC is
> > configured to operate at forced speed(1000Mbps)
> > and full duplex. Modified driver to accommodate
> > PHY and NON-PHY mode.
> 
> I agree with Florian here. Look at all the in kernel examples of a SoC
> MAC connected to an Ethernet switch. Some use rgmii, others 1000BaseX
> or higher. But they all follow the same scheme, and don't need
> invasive MAC driver changes.


Can you provide the examples which you looked at ?

Daniel