Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp7084969pxv; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOuFlTSyWnuMVMTZ0ucgaorVQg5gQyNOEUS9Y4fPGDUcg5ESEnUvxniyJjBaf6BvIwLUuo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:58b:: with SMTP id v11mr152357iox.70.1627663105576; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627663105; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j1KfI1AUbvpobcswwY2buu1UwTF0IX4zdQxt4G9y03RyqPLvHLczpsx9A6vVjPK6he rSfxfCyDltUJWKwP1SY58vmcDJpfoXLiLh9Q8QcIWv9XybTN1cdl5/EFrF+FDY9vPEqN Xhhs1Dj6FxVspcxcJ+bW6ThGSCK3oyrpugXoAyBSut7ZbagvNwuE2Cqy7hMSh6j4SKou Kq6qzwP6nwgb/rWUFfXQN060MsPu2OZxs3SD5Sdz4P8jWvfmXbi2FoDG57x02/1R1Kco 3R1ctW2ElsqqWbt2SL7obJrJa/mcgWyrOKO86WW+GhNc7Mc4/hAwWKwtoR3d7lFsqdbG uqIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=+VAdv+WeR1jvOvgcgnqcYxpRfRpHfv5qO3GWKK9dmZw=; b=lfvkqUWWmG+rI4AuRbU/+TRzGTfS2b5dYPS4JW+zJ2KFxEA0bsfzCAoB+Wuzt6+OaN kyVBY/FswkF8zodwAplaTaSiOiF9esl4tzw9oUQYr0l83J8mQceaxEsHzmxgrileEXZZ WglcpyZ15/lnw0vdzJhqaMeXbPc7bXhIKQW6eO/r5bqiELHZSjY83Q9rFNSTm1KS4p1A +A+++MM8kpS1Dleh2ZYXe9lBBKk3sLpEo4czKKqYgz4ezWg1dgr79I6wg1/t+kiHA5Xd q4ot70NXaiswtv6XJ6DvNk1K5BWf4Oxhu9idyxac8is81DC62cOls8NJRvF1269d7IXk Zn8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=LMBohOIT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n24si2428176ioz.5.2021.07.30.09.38.06; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=LMBohOIT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229708AbhG3Qg4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:36:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46894 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229521AbhG3Qg4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:36:56 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649A4C06175F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u25so13914363oiv.5 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:36:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+VAdv+WeR1jvOvgcgnqcYxpRfRpHfv5qO3GWKK9dmZw=; b=LMBohOITePzc4wVsTkFVhKygBXZW4iqgqr2pshr0IqV5u30sIL8eN1nNetsNSxtslD lXY9rHs5iWFhNBa36KgiFggL/E2bEc/L8pGCNbdfg5n5ujjQBUPZcBtvrw/HipQOqqy3 Rphy/TGaj1NfoXlRQKp8Bc4McAATWnXDGrWIVHkz+NHASH3PqVvlEk0SqeWV3NzUTqbm FgFfUetOtWSOCy+eEHRQRXo2tLraleRZ92zu3BDHRO2LoXBwTcu3+WEZv5NvKVYIQGrP QaOBRSHoD9iI3iFSoYye911ZQngN9QIpB84gvYZxoZ2R+IR7XxwyRiEjWLf+ScM01e/+ eAyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+VAdv+WeR1jvOvgcgnqcYxpRfRpHfv5qO3GWKK9dmZw=; b=Yn7+lLlrJWfcyBWjL9+7jkhIcwczXbpreNuczS+JEWpwsA/Qni1zwT0Mlmd+HNd8PL Vh7Cn+XvQBP+/oQ/zYeN2vJaPBOWfpL4wvIqQoFISxndV5Hwy4X+Lf5vAzmkg/hQ7jYH odU8HALp8yqhUTOogUbw4mbtP6Q/Lk0musCaunFt+Ee1zyd+WohX4aUrKZkwOjdGyytD 8+l6O5tIijArbZbKpAXtLfWEJ69aL9zEFA4LWQmx4bleC9k+qXvVHEYZoMBH8r5LItUg NEmCAvy3EbtunezkMw3W05ApGirLM6S+H3k8CoMzcnUU/NUws1CpxPdXME/OJ+85Wzfp t2rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533r1HiCh/GWlQUTYdgx1pDCsnpy7NUuAAC5N6B8fi62aVfNRlTH Rl/ReNASXvnbPRuIibaOcZu/3Q== X-Received: by 2002:aca:f54c:: with SMTP id t73mr2367532oih.175.1627663009726; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w24sm372033otp.28.2021.07.30.09.36.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:36:46 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Sibi Sankar Cc: mka@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, agross@kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org, sidgup@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5: Use qmp_send to update co-processor load state Message-ID: References: <1626755807-11865-1-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> <1626755807-11865-5-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1626755807-11865-5-git-send-email-sibis@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 19 Jul 23:36 CDT 2021, Sibi Sankar wrote: > The power domains exposed by the AOSS QMP driver control the load state > resources linked to modem, adsp, cdsp remoteprocs. These are used to > notify the Always on Subsystem (AOSS) that a particular co-processor is > up/down. AOSS uses this information to wait for the co-processors to > suspend before starting its sleep sequence. > > These co-processors enter low-power modes independent to that of the > application processor and the load state resources linked to them are > expected to remain unaltered across system suspend/resume cycles. To > achieve this behavior lets stop using the power-domains exposed by the > AOSS QMP node and replace them with generic qmp_send interface instead. > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar > --- > > v4: > * Drop unused pdev and kfree the load state string in q6v5_deinit > /probe path for patch 4. [Matthias] > > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h | 7 ++- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 7 ++- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 44 ++++--------------- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 85 +++++++++---------------------------- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 4 +- > 6 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c > index 7e9244c748da..997ff21271f7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c > @@ -16,8 +16,28 @@ > #include "qcom_common.h" > #include "qcom_q6v5.h" > > +#define Q6V5_LOAD_STATE_MSG_LEN 64 > #define Q6V5_PANIC_DELAY_MS 200 > > +static int q6v5_load_state_toggle(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5, bool enable) > +{ > + char buf[Q6V5_LOAD_STATE_MSG_LEN] = {}; > + int ret; > + > + if (IS_ERR(q6v5->qmp)) I would prefer that you keep it NULL when there's no qmp. > + return 0; > + > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), > + "{class: image, res: load_state, name: %s, val: %s}", > + q6v5->load_state, enable ? "on" : "off"); > + > + ret = qmp_send(q6v5->qmp, buf, sizeof(buf)); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(q6v5->dev, "failed to toggle load state\n"); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > /** > * qcom_q6v5_prepare() - reinitialize the qcom_q6v5 context before start > * @q6v5: reference to qcom_q6v5 context to be reinitialized > @@ -26,6 +46,12 @@ > */ > int qcom_q6v5_prepare(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5) > { > + int ret; > + > + ret = q6v5_load_state_toggle(q6v5, true); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > reinit_completion(&q6v5->start_done); > reinit_completion(&q6v5->stop_done); > > @@ -47,6 +73,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_q6v5_prepare); > int qcom_q6v5_unprepare(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5) > { > disable_irq(q6v5->handover_irq); > + q6v5_load_state_toggle(q6v5, false); > > return !q6v5->handover_issued; > } > @@ -196,12 +223,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_q6v5_panic); > * @pdev: platform_device reference for acquiring resources > * @rproc: associated remoteproc instance > * @crash_reason: SMEM id for crash reason string, or 0 if none > + * @load_state: load state resource string > * @handover: function to be called when proxy resources should be released > * > * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on failure > */ > int qcom_q6v5_init(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5, struct platform_device *pdev, > - struct rproc *rproc, int crash_reason, > + struct rproc *rproc, int crash_reason, const char *load_state, > void (*handover)(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5)) > { > int ret; > @@ -286,9 +314,36 @@ int qcom_q6v5_init(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5, struct platform_device *pdev, > return PTR_ERR(q6v5->state); > } > > + q6v5->load_state = kstrdup_const(load_state, GFP_KERNEL); Can't you use devm_kstrdup_const(&pdev->dev, ...) for this? > + q6v5->qmp = qmp_get(&pdev->dev); > + if (IS_ERR(q6v5->qmp)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(q6v5->qmp) != -ENODEV) { > + if (PTR_ERR(q6v5->qmp) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to acquire load state\n"); > + kfree_const(q6v5->load_state); Then you don't need to free it here. > + return PTR_ERR(q6v5->qmp); > + } > + } else { > + if (!q6v5->load_state) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "load state resource string empty\n"); > + return -EINVAL; I see two cases here: 1) kstrdup_const() failed to allocate memory, the error print is unnecessary and misleading and it would be more appropriate to return -ENOMEM. 2) kstrdup_const() failed because you passed load_state == NULL, in which case the error message could be more helpful by saying "unexpected qcom,qmp property found" or something like that. > + } > + } > + > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_q6v5_init); > > +/** > + * qcom_q6v5_deinit() - deinitialize the q6v5 common struct > + * @q6v5: reference to qcom_q6v5 context to be deinitialized > + */ > +void qcom_q6v5_deinit(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5) > +{ > + kfree_const(q6v5->load_state); > + qmp_put(q6v5->qmp); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_q6v5_deinit); > + > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Peripheral Image Loader for Q6V5"); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h > index 1c212f670cbc..f35e04471ed7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > > struct rproc; > struct qcom_smem_state; > @@ -15,6 +16,8 @@ struct qcom_q6v5 { > struct rproc *rproc; > > struct qcom_smem_state *state; > + struct qmp *qmp; > + > unsigned stop_bit; > > int wdog_irq; > @@ -32,12 +35,14 @@ struct qcom_q6v5 { > > bool running; > > + const char *load_state; > void (*handover)(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5); > }; > > int qcom_q6v5_init(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5, struct platform_device *pdev, > - struct rproc *rproc, int crash_reason, > + struct rproc *rproc, int crash_reason, const char *load_state, > void (*handover)(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5)); > +void qcom_q6v5_deinit(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5); > > int qcom_q6v5_prepare(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5); > int qcom_q6v5_unprepare(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > index 8b0d8bbacd2e..098362e6e233 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > @@ -185,7 +185,9 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc) > int ret; > unsigned int val; > > - qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5); > + ret = qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5); > + if (ret) > + return ret; In the (hopefully unlikely) case that we have instances of qcom_q6v5_prepare() failing today, the switch to the new qmp interface would also introduce a regression in the same commit. Could you please add the error handling in a separate commit? Just so that we can pinpoint which of the two changes caused any issues if we need to bisect this? Regards, Bjorn