Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:16:17 +0800
From:   Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To:     Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/11] tools: gpio: Add new hardware clock type
Message-ID: <20210731061617.GA12414@sol>
References: <20210625235532.19575-1-dipenp@nvidia.com>
 <20210625235532.19575-10-dipenp@nvidia.com>
 <CACRpkdaqKJLUdf3NiFHaTgu6buyhMb_D1yKyHF4M=eTQ94pe-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <b87fa5d8-bef9-9046-9747-d4428ddf58ea@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b87fa5d8-bef9-9046-9747-d4428ddf58ea@nvidia.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 08:17:22PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
> 
> On 6/27/21 4:36 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:48 AM Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> gpiolib-cdev is extended to support hardware clock type, this
> >> patch reflects that fact.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
> > (...)
> >>                 case 'w':
> >>                         config.flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME;
> >>                         break;
> >> +               case 't':
> >> +                       config.flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE;
> >> +                       break;
> > After the checking of the command line options we need a small sanity
> > check so we don't try to enable both realtime and hardware clock
> > at the same time, we will only be able to request one of them.
> 
> This will any way fail at gpiolib-cdev layer. Do we want to add it here
> 
> as well?
> 

I can't speak for Linus, but I'm fine with it as is as it allows the tool
to be used to exercise the sanity check in the kernel.

Cheers,
Kent.