Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c7c6:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h6csp289056pxy;
        Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypD0BI8431x9p6QyTs/17n1kRG7ZjyRt4fE5IobzVuakBzWjxWXZTPQeW/b0HMxEzhfzOl
X-Received: by 2002:a02:7348:: with SMTP id a8mr6522532jae.116.1627741390506;
        Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627741390; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=qO5TU0enKMozr5+CpSlh2nJXstgzRnrdblth9q1ShdMDM1t4lx53Sj8LrH5ezzu4k8
         CuELi+aX9nQnRaY67pCW0EVh2yqcL754ElxZBgM0SEAoG49R3eVQef/0g35WPHLUWydr
         NXQ11hO8mjxomjbJf1NvzFcSLaWtr/ncEwu7Sx0pW7tl+eicvlbnX3a1aUzCsk9TJxOF
         88JarHE7H4IWJbW2LHJpCbb3FeFEJUybt/Uu4mnOY8od1oVCwX/2qp3GMHL5GN8+Maon
         qq3sH5ybm6dFSP4zAl1+ekuf7FdLx58YuFDBhWwzOpH1vRvKp8Qz/1Q53hNJNjL64nNA
         9BBQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition
         :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date;
        bh=vYiehpnybRXiiyMrDLegKc3a3WhoAPrsd6T9k2BqlOc=;
        b=CVqbkWzUUU3kMS+rw4u7O8E+MPgPd+cC88C1oHKX5YAeAwvy5HOeDUgC6Ua8Y2iwhg
         ZTWKdNJCOn7IH7b4vmZzv5PfIyt2BsjDdUgRpUodecumM7+uEKhd/7K73FAgay3qwG8I
         bWga8ixsPySSWilHab45GdeAWlT7BBa1mTO3ebx7WQNTW6qWJZBnEvMmWuKTNctmaTRR
         Pezcv/RFxC1sI5Q/t1y+NfZxYG9vSIjir72r9TeXeZfD6sVPuJ+QaLJ6AYJZTkXS2EnZ
         6BKvmA/sV5mSZ7e4qOIbIywvvRobx2MiErlrphOvTrl5HES4Qq8ixQ8a9G3G4F52uR8v
         GGVg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5si6226971iol.44.2021.07.31.07.22.56;
        Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S232752AbhGaOWL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux.s.jambekar@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:22:11 -0400
Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk ([142.44.231.140]:58698 "EHLO
        zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S233040AbhGaOV7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:21:59 -0400
Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1m9ppr-005VDZ-5V; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:19:31 +0000
Date:   Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:19:31 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: use 'unsigned int' instead of bare 'unsigned'
Message-ID: <YQVb84k5eI4XqIwD@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
References: <20210731125027.404300-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210731125027.404300-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 08:50:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'.

Why?  This is not much of an explanation, is it?