Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c7c6:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h6csp290186pxy; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:24:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzD0F4qlfOn9CTUeRHXI98MfWVyuKKxtdRKVSrA9JtpTiaq94kWpvDa9qt54peYbYr0oR6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:2111:: with SMTP id n17mr6453263jaj.76.1627741491988; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627741491; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jDGfhHdjeOxFctyBXmZKLsVukw9GFq4BSGK74LL3re+dG+7CzP9pglgJkTgA0FQFXM qV3h4eo0xWawkwd4bHSQZwGREmzd736rMhtrcvV16UrCXs4Y14YQYvcBv8Yde6YWdClz B6tVnEy8MrfIoVSasEWcfv4KVtn2WO0LNclk0yjHFCUFAot+mTxyo3mb/Ewb65lM7t0+ FjHFVqN28Z9NQzG240RCj1bWRU9xXRSFGwloH7kyifQdj512q8WWPJnTgzu+HWlDH0nf 9+mD4yQ1kIWqyl/1qDy7DB1vFamXxzle+V9bDvI6qMO1SqyU+TO6Pj9kQN/JrjIGkSH4 KkMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=MuxDz3peId903q3O80iKn5lnr5citBVnqvq0qaFOsvo=; b=cwGt8Yamn5yuTuW3cb7/pYWL0bXJaIVtWp2SGHIiZh9X76o43s8RXhQ/lzY115GjTZ GJDZcY7Q4h4FG/6ZvPdl2D9O5CWb+u95MSr33FEm9/Pxol5cFGxU7f8MG3Y9GFuuAEvW ArCNMbo4YjOLTB0s5rU1bKem/XehSdUvxKZhAUmy/bUoTtpwVTUFOXLbZJlboMSmIohS p7N0TtciJpeSS2qC+7PllRq2LpCwjKHJ4tPtuJ/Km9Y5u3cA/bQCoY3snO31jj8u9yLX FugNBalCjNP7aCeqmHQDa55EKOUaY+v7Z3+jPsUDx5JB72ML0OVya64NdLVugjGrm+mI v0sQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5si6226971iol.44.2021.07.31.07.24.39; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233161AbhGaOYA (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:24:00 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk ([142.44.231.140]:58704 "EHLO zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233150AbhGaOXR (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 10:23:17 -0400 Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m9prE-005VEI-Af; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:20:56 +0000 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:20:56 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Jason Wang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] file: use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned' Message-ID: References: <20210731130957.416337-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210731130957.416337-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 09:09:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'. Same question.