Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c7c6:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h6csp367373pxy; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvrbD6foiWUvyp8/Pp6g/pz32IuhWR0704BTCfDwNEV+Uk4lfTi7Ifdncmt1seaPTO6ncG X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ec0d:: with SMTP id c13mr1303545ioh.108.1627749855751; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627749855; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DPiENBJ0iJQwsDD/k6FA1cWWX9+yf+vF8w/98gd/CAi0dd0k2xx0pVtZp49wYg4DWp gwJKLwtAL2euSc4At9Gsag5L3H/OMoREIKJZr+sRLpufc0du5QDClzLtkmCdtzw/F5tn EddIshsfw5cJr1ORY17Ursg8A4IZ3sWfnigsh9Os5z+V8PyBukvFyPYr4WcOL8sHCFxJ s4V8N+5TdqVqToS7ufd0K/83nw91Ng0k0PelxY8oy+oTWx3WMAypKkWvkcou2T+N17ng xziskl81nXyLd2mTMPze9NY3i8eeIaedrzWcJZoK4pLelekCp6g5RntBUb+YmGvtPzUC LU1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=fxoSHOpYwolhWshMT8asjoM6BCrhkLAeDZ4VOmASK98=; b=duexOIlK8yzqPku+r7FqkSSVaQoq4QUjn16x3ZSdGqVBppXH5WwCpcFubjFfUZ7IGX BxBcCQAmuFPRYJkbbLZFEUt1vbv6eG+KMg6opmndn79NcqUjW29XMCW8hQkNi4zIav+N /OMcyQS8OvpyUukE6+BN2owDMgHm8M8QFYV8Oa1DwulA1Qceej66Hf1tq3HZkf3oUawS v+DwG7xuPkIzw9w7BKqiHATxCgnbnOIT5v4k/QwtyWQucPry/4ENcYD5eHVSBKtmxiLB Q8IQAgYIyCMI41zaDfoo8/fHEz1plldMUOCibWmthXrWye08Qnb49YkQ083/e22ypW/o 6EWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y1si5789634jao.99.2021.07.31.09.44.03; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229694AbhGaQnW (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:43:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40292 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229449AbhGaQnV (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:43:21 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF14360D07; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:45:51 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Tang Bin Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Shengju Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: fsl-imx25-gcq: fix the right check and simplify code Message-ID: <20210731174551.188aee79@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20210727125209.28248-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <20210727125209.28248-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:52:09 +0800 Tang Bin wrote: > For the function of platform_get_irq(), the example in platform.c is > * int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > * if (irq < 0) > * return irq; > So the return value of zero is unnecessary to check. And move it > up to a little bit can simplify the code jump. > > Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju > Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju > Signed-off-by: Tang Bin Hi, Logically it is better to keep the irq handling all together, so I would prefer we didn't move it. Also, platform_get_irq() is documented as never returning 0, so the current code is not incorrect. As such, this looks like noise unless there is some plan to make use of the 0 return value? What benefit do we get from this change? Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c | 12 ++++-------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c b/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c > index 8cb51cf7a..d28976f21 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c > @@ -320,6 +320,10 @@ static int mx25_gcq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (priv->irq < 0) > + return priv->irq; > + > for (i = 0; i != 4; ++i) { > if (!priv->vref[i]) > continue; > @@ -336,14 +340,6 @@ static int mx25_gcq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_vref_disable; > } > > - priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (priv->irq <= 0) { > - ret = priv->irq; > - if (!ret) > - ret = -ENXIO; > - goto err_clk_unprepare; > - } > - > ret = request_irq(priv->irq, mx25_gcq_irq, 0, pdev->name, priv); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "Failed requesting IRQ\n");