Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:59:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:59:14 -0500 Received: from mailout5-1.nyroc.rr.com ([24.92.226.169]:31441 "EHLO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:59:10 -0500 Message-ID: <07ee01c16d2b$ec945550$1a01a8c0@allyourbase> From: "Dan Maas" To: "Philip Dodd" Cc: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Athlon SMP blues - kernels 2.4.[9 13 15-pre4] Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:46:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I confirm that XP chips aren't supported in smp configs > by AMD. I can't of the top of my head give URLs to confirm This is just your typical profit-maximizing hardware vendor price discrimination scheme. i.e. make one product, but sell at two different price levels. Sprinkle on some FUD about how the cheaper part isn't suitable for "professional" use, and there you go... Pretty much all tech companies use some variant of this trick, because it is almost always cheaper to mass-produce one product and sell a crippled version also, than to mass-produce two products with truly different costs. But since we are all l33t hackers we see right through this and brazenly stick unapproved Athlons in SMP systems. (At least until AMD sees this as enough of a threat to actually disable SMP functions via technical means =) Regards, Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/