Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758302AbWK0PjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:39:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758303AbWK0PjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:39:05 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:18565 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758302AbWK0PjD (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:39:03 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Amul Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make the NUMA hash function nodemap allocation dynamic and remove NODEMAPSIZE Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:38:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Eric Dumazet , LKML References: <1163627312.3553.199.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> <200611271123.11649.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <1164641576.3227.12.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> In-Reply-To: <1164641576.3227.12.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611271638.54559.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 686 Lines: 18 > I believe that this problem is related to a new patch that enhances the > fake NUMA code (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/469457). I haven't got these patches applied, so that's unlikely. BTW if you resubmit make sure to keep the #ifdefs I added -- your original version didn't compile without CONFIG_NUMA Does it work for you when you boot the kernel on a non NUMA system (like a normal small Intel platform)? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/