Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210730225939.3852712-1-mizhang@google.com> <20210730225939.3852712-4-mizhang@google.com>
 <YQh5baC5cYAuj6y0@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <YQh5baC5cYAuj6y0@google.com>
From:   Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:45:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL715WJ1=ZA+0hBzCfUQBvvuN_++iQG1wc=JKfmpq-iUnDxkVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Add detailed page size stats
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

>
> Looks good, but you'll probably need/want to rebase to kvm/queue once that settles
> down (I suspect a forced push is coming this week).  This has quite a few conflicts
> with other stuff sitting in kvm/queue.

will do.

> > @@ -235,9 +235,12 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
> >       STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, mmu_recycled),
> >       STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, mmu_cache_miss),
> >       STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, mmu_unsync),
> > -     STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, lpages),
> >       STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, nx_lpage_splits),
> > -     STATS_DESC_PCOUNTER(VM, max_mmu_page_hash_collisions)
> > +     STATS_DESC_PCOUNTER(VM, max_mmu_page_hash_collisions),
> > +     STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, pages_4k),
> > +     STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, pages_2m),
> > +     STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, pages_1g),
> > +     STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VM, pages_512g)
>
> Uber nit that I wouldn't even have noticed if this didn't conflict, but there's
> no need to land the union and the stats definitions at the end of the structs,
> i.e. the new fields can directly replace lpages.  I don't think it will actually
> avoid a conflict, but it would avoid modifying the max_mmu_page_hash_collisions
> line.
>

ah, so I will just remove 'lpages' and put new lines in place instead
appending those at the end. Yeah, I did not know that it can create
conflicts. So, I will change that.