Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c7c6:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h6csp2124171pxy; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:39:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynHXP/2u/DXlPSnyHoTzWwlOM6RuE+NhYnnBa0Fvc3G+ODJa2Bd6H0j57CMVjFHNSexr+A X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:446:: with SMTP id e6mr1909904iov.85.1627961957335; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 20:39:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627961957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ust1zxZ2qY1frnqfadiS/rCQhSRxFuaMSXud+XChAL3JSoHDuoN2ouroV+PX8uPCwR rDz80Mkx7oWn3pZOv3P8LvO85efALF7d6EcOyh3qXL9VB4GckuzemFb5D1L+AYerkV4Y 41l0Ki5G57dPoS2kuIiWBC75CvjHmsaNabpIBXMjRYdNgZYKoMkp6kYSPiuYEU5b1x2a Z80o9EplT7eZujoUnwqomxiGmXfp5QszARJnVWO8oVVtRvS4ZJwSzHqwcV3yed+HpPKE Y9o/vzABHfiM9uaTfcUVhvjdc1FhbwADtBmGEfB9oamODF53exzLQrzbrFexo8G8iARo X+9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=6fp3R3Y0VQQElz2ID5vC23wKnaL7snmrPpck61BPtak=; b=AGXQbPW7hoYMUDElT8Lq+fJSrEpAIrRQ3lPr26Y8E+J24BtC86DMBOJfZxjS82d+8L G6/4+5id0nyeX+tGKhoyETtvFuPqBth5sklGG2+pzD7pHf7jO0XXVhoJBwcv8HBmWuU/ iVfVc6YxF+zHsi20ekQmrPEQ+94mGcIyHCjInQcdCVDoRVM8V6J2VXur8+no3ZpDOCCl dspoPi909PSuvjSGCkJdKvCBsiGUOM3rv5h4FxpFc+gzpDPF+2XiDLNuTWEkU/95idFU 7OKZw2PbMiZoouFdw64o4L1tJEz5tg6xr/f3U0UcC8tcLhLyQZUwByBtQWlh/TofE6Qr zRFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b12si13805835ioj.88.2021.08.02.20.39.05; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 20:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233542AbhHCDi3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 23:38:29 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:35708 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233197AbhHCDi2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 23:38:28 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10064"; a="200774735" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,290,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="200774735" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2021 20:38:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,290,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="510848535" Received: from yilunxu-optiplex-7050.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.162]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2021 20:38:15 -0700 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:32:24 +0800 From: Xu Yilun To: Tom Rix Cc: Moritz Fischer , "Wu, Hao" , "Weight, Russell H" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: region: handle compat_id as an uuid Message-ID: <20210803033224.GA461389@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> References: <20210726202650.4074614-1-trix@redhat.com> <6f30a4c6-61a0-bb57-9f13-bcad3f3589b8@intel.com> <20210730014859.GA436611@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 05:07:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 7/29/21 6:48 PM, Xu Yilun wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:16:47PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote: > > > On 7/29/21 11:51 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:36:56AM +0000, Wu, Hao wrote: > > > > > > On 7/26/21 3:12 PM, Russ Weight wrote: > > > > > > > On 7/26/21 1:26 PM, trix@redhat.com wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Tom Rix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An fpga region's compat_id is exported by the sysfs > > > > > > > > as a 128 bit hex string formed by concatenating two > > > > > > > > 64 bit values together. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only user of compat_id is dfl. Its user library > > > > > > > > opae converts this value into a uuid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ex/ > > > > > > > > $ cat /sys/class/fpga_region/region1/compat_id > > > > > > > > f3c9941350814aadbced07eb84a6d0bb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is reported as > > > > > > > > $ fpgainfo bmc > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Pr Interface Id : f3c99413-5081-4aad-bced-07eb84a6d0bb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Storing a uuid as 2 64 bit values is vendor specific. > > > > > > > > And concatenating them together is vendor specific. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is better to store and print out as a vendor neutral uuid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Change fpga_compat_id from a struct to a union. > > > > > > > > Keep the old 64 bit values for dfl. > > > > > > > > Sysfs output is now > > > > > > > > f3c99413-5081-4aad-bced-07eb84a6d0bb > > > > > > > I'm fowarding feedback from Tim Whisonant, one of the OPAE userspace > > > > > > > developers: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that this change to the sysfs for the compat_id node will > > > > > > > end up breaking the SDK, which does not expect the '-' characters to > > > > > > > be included when parsing the sysfs value. Currently, it is parsed as > > > > > > > a raw hex string without regard to any '-' characters. This goes for > > > > > > > any "guid" currently exported by sysfs and for what we read in the > > > > > > > device MMIO space. > > > > > > Yes, it will. > > > > > > > > > > > > And there are other places, like dfl-afu-main.c:afu_id_show() > > > > > > > > > > > > outputs raw hex that sdk turns into a uuid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some options. > > > > > > > > > > > > If no one but dfl will ever use it, then v1 of patchset. > > > > > > > > > > > > If others can use it but don't want to change dfl, then v2 of patchset, > > > > > > my favorite. > > > > > > > > > > > > Or this one for uuid for everyone, what have been v3 but changed too much. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could dfl change generally to output uuid's to the sysfs ? > > > > > > > > > > > > this would be generally helpful and a one time disruption to the sdk. > > > > > This change limited the output format to uuid_t, but if any hardware doesn't > > > > > use uuid_t on hardware may have to convert it back from the sysfs output in > > > > > userspace. Leave it to print hardware values (e.g. from register), and convert > > > > > it in userspace should be fine too I think. > > > > I'm not entirely sure. I seem to recall there being examples of sysfs > > > > files returning different things for different drivers. > > > > > > > > That being said it seems largely cosmetic to add the '-' in between. > > > > > > > > If it breaks userspace, I'm against it. If you *need* it make a > > > > compat_uuid entry or something in that case? > > > My gripe is > > > > > > For a nominally common interface, compat_id has a vendor specific output. > > > > > > If for example another vendor wanted to use this field but their natural > > > format was an OF string. > > > > > > 16 bytes of raw hex would not work for them, so they would roll their own. > > > > > > which defeats the purpose of a common interface. > > > > > > > > > The language in the docs as-is is vague on the output format. > > > > > > DFL is the only user of the interface. > > > > > > So ver 2 > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/4ab7dd2d-c215-6333-6860-6f7d0ac64c3d@redhat.com/ > > > > > > Keeps the output as-is for dfl, so nothing breaks in userspace > > > > > > And adds flexibility for vendors to output their appropriate natural form. > > > > > > So compat_id becomes generally useful. > > Mixing types seems be strongly against in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst. > > So in my opinion there should be a determined format for the output. The > > concern for this patch is which one is a better format, uuid style or > > 128 bit raw hex? > > > > And I vote for 128 bit raw hex, as other vendors may not use uuid_t as > > the identifier, may be an OF string. So we don't have to force them > > decorate it as the uuid style. > > So you would be ok with v2 of this patchset ? No. I prefer we keep the current implementation. I mean 128 bit raw hex could be a more compatible output format for all vendors, uuid style, string style or others. Thanks, Yilun > > Tom > > > > > Thanks > > Yilun > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > - Moritz > > > >