Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: do not open code locks for
 VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc:     Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
        cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
References: <20210719193503.793910-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
 <3f45fe31-6666-ac87-3a98-dd942b5dfb3c@linux.ibm.com>
 <20210802155355.22b98789.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
 <6f37ef28-3cce-2f4f-3173-2c1e916900cc@linux.ibm.com>
 <20210803130850.GY1721383@nvidia.com>
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <b7272d7a-851f-aefd-cdda-be061d4e309a@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:34:02 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
In-Reply-To: <20210803130850.GY1721383@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk


On 8/3/21 9:08 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 12:32:12PM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> On 8/2/21 9:53 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:26 -0400
>>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> PING!
>>>>
>>>> This patch will pre-req version 17 of a patch series I have waiting in
>>>> the wings,
>>>> so I'd like to get this one merged ASAP. In particular, if a KVM
>>>> maintainer can
>>>> take a look at the comments concerning the taking of the kvm->lock
>>>> before the
>>>> matrix_mdev->lock it would be greatly appreciated. Those comments begin with
>>>> Message ID <20210727004329.3bcc7d4f.pasic@linux.ibm.com> from Halil Pasic.
>>> As far as I'm concerned, we can move forward with this. Was this
>>> supposed to go in via Alex's tree?
>> I am not certain, Christian queued the previous patches related to
>> this on:
>>
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/log/?h=fixes
>>
>> Jason G., since this will need to be integrated with your other patches,
>> where should this be queued?
> I prefer changes to the vfio stuff go to Alex as we are changing it a
> lot as well this cycle.

Thanks Jason.

>
> Jason