Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 03 Aug 2021 21:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: Add ethernet0 to the aliases node
In-Reply-To: <CAEUhbmUkuKd7itzvQyzrYeqfUQv6LCqkXDsO=yufQppDBceLQQ@mail.gmail.com>
CC:     geert@linux-m68k.org, lewis.hanly@microchip.com,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        bin.meng@windriver.com
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To:     bmeng.cn@gmail.com
Message-ID: <mhng-e1c39f7c-9667-4711-b2fc-0875cd0695a9@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:55:56 PDT (-0700), bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:55 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:34:02 PDT (-0700), geert@linux-m68k.org wrote:
>> > Hi Bin,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:14 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:44 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
>> >> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
>> >> > > @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ / {
>> >> > >         model = "Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit";
>> >> > >         compatible = "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit";
>> >> > >
>> >> > > +       aliases {
>> >> > > +               ethernet0 = &emac1;
>> >> > > +       };
>> >> > > +
>> >> > >         chosen {
>> >> > >         };
>> >> >
>> >> > This should be added to the board DTS (microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts)
>> >> > instead.
>> >>
>> >> I was wondering the same thing before doing this, but when I checked
>> >> all other DTS in arch/riscv/boot I found the aliases node is put in
>> >> the SoC dtsi file instead of the board on so I think that's the
>> >> convention.
>> >
>> > The numbering of the aliases is supposed to match the labels on the
>> > board, hence it is board-specific, not SoC-specific.
>> >
>> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>> >
>> >                         Geert
>>
>> I don't see a v2 of this.
>
> Will send v2 soon.

Thanks.  I'm assuming you're going to send both patches.