Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp23402pxt; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:07:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEVobo5P2+/hKSuwoyHUw+k3ekW0ge3df/uoyxcBBuFLP7REMtRxJDwbV6kvG5oIOM8fRe X-Received: by 2002:a50:9b16:: with SMTP id o22mr29292528edi.342.1628078845397; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:07:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628078845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zIEjgcvV8fmjJWQRkt1YmD5AR2d1hDOZ54vqeIMr9rWgfrS7xNPdjhzbBfyDmp4V6j hsqbS6kJZzLspeQs4FJTWFAKGrkW0NhkIkjS++lGl3aBN9PBk+QV3nNAv3yoGDtxeXeL scuExGjPJrW4zd61kQ/VEWjWnIhvmaK7ggewPdi6X+gDbOZXar/bjLwUBkHepM4pylgY rvlQW3w0b3kgGl4G3IgSqwKndC34jCgc9AZt9DpHENRGNDg1iCMlC9cl3lJ7pQfxxsO5 kvZTzFbzXdk8Cpt3tE9I7NgK4o3DtnazTdw/uen06NhpE0IagUzuM0jgLWMiVSjLW+hc nEiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=Dx/BbhepeyNlaF2sx0Qlozia3qj416u/0jHGaWBds3k=; b=c+wRXnOAUnsa4PNfCfSosOUtmjX3/WYqtRP+w6FI5j8apqhlmGkn3bTFn5eInaAfCU WF1k3ORL3gTwjumDlp3h9P/dUBFmcvE+8NYzHbinJ76fwE0aGWsPv29cxf4it+cp2GU+ EQPxY0aTxrp/LRi2Q2LryYi7VqJDw5FSaFVV0hJPRWG/4DQYpbeLDzFAo0LTsnjF0Yfn A4Nyp+xw0VwKGO0dwsuFiw/EMtnCfMMVDrz1M8jC05qU8KHVcJ6Ulq6wmQDKjAQHC316 t5bdLriF+uOYh2lbS8O9BKBbL3ueHgyCbTFDEHBZbzoOdDmk6cmZF+tEA5g5B5AEgG3Y HXGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t22si2081691ejy.236.2021.08.04.05.06.58; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236919AbhHDJFC (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:05:02 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:33559 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235471AbhHDJFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:05:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10065"; a="212019844" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,293,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="212019844" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Aug 2021 02:04:42 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,293,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="521763227" Received: from rongch2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.30.199]) ([10.255.30.199]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Aug 2021 02:04:40 -0700 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave' To: Dave Hansen , kernel test robot , Dave Hansen Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List References: <202107271153.7QWf3g6F-lkp@intel.com> From: "Chen, Rong A" Message-ID: <8bee8632-9129-bb02-ab94-f65786e65268@intel.com> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:04:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/27/2021 10:52 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 7/26/21 8:11 PM, kernel test robot wrote: >>>> sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave' > > Is there something else funky going on here? All of the "-mxsave" flags > that I can find are under checks for x86 builds, like: > > ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1) > $(BINARIES_32): CFLAGS += -m32 -mxsave > .. > > I'm confused how we could have a sparc64 compiler (and only a sparc64 > compiler) that would end up with "-mxsave" in CFLAGS. Hi Dave, We can reproduce the error and have no idea too, but we have disabled the test for selftests on non-x86 arch. Best Regards, Rong Chen