Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935997AbWK1TxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:53:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936076AbWK1TxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:53:12 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:37393 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936077AbWK1TxK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:53:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BcXu80SwkkF7CrS9uxn44NfkSREnkU6OlW0Reekjx/wC62YIWacaq79RrBusiK/OgkIrUpsMK5Y3pqwRfTQIRjLBSC5cPKxDNOkjY+5Yao7+UX+3oCsKCuDaHMZYn16egO9dGmwOPT+NtSJC1yIymtQtSVyjbdnSK4HFq6nLj6U= Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0611281153l17c2a8f9y28185420f137d0fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:53:08 -0800 From: "Mark Knecht" To: "Lee Revell" Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt5 Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1164735207.1701.19.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061120220230.GA30835@elte.hu> <5bdc1c8b0611220606m31c397d1ubafae3460d36db09@mail.gmail.com> <1164735207.1701.19.camel@mindpipe> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1350 Lines: 35 On 11/28/06, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Ingo, > > I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your > > 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I > > am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason > > to reboot. > > > > I know there were some comments awhile back about being required to > > switch to PAM. Has that occurred? > > > > If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm. > > As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable kernel > module API it's impossible to prevent regressions. > > That being said, the realtime LSM patch is so simple that it should work > - how exactly does it fail? > > Lee Hi Lee, The failure is a Gentoo sandbax failure. On the surface of it I didn't really think it was a kernel problem but I know you've pushed me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement instead of only best practice. Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/