Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp340443pxt; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGlSjCGvgIhRe+VduSQik0ntAptZbPh92PUCHOAtN2f6aUqhRuJrKXbiH4mcz6o4KsgCfX X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2a4b:: with SMTP id k11mr12504iov.58.1628149191342; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628149191; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hlkFKv/KYgOErrSQPEkaFR1rTPoKcIqn1vz1KU5pewH59nqfOXUoHm7K5hanJJrpHQ n0rwa68TgLuxsCosDUzfutJsj6jKBvTKcsO1aXA9WQNM6iVjMpLxyv+G0Ka/bXfVEiS6 x0TSJAKzMvCg4xm5bdZGXHQIHY2Q38iIKuNtCSYSmSJ79QyRs5inWx1yXFnX1RyVS3yU xVexwEFp3FvHglMQkarWN5LDCO4WjvTym+jGBlo1EY6g6Uh0E9url5vINcnu2brImK8r AfpEuNM2nDXErZ9KnA+rl7/PKB1ik1I00yEBXnQNirKdq+fRHqae/ZLEXzZIXsJJklES E82w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=FkL9np5HE5mawBpGWfUQVMs1Jp3nZ1r2uXir2/3ncE4=; b=aj6+gvofWrOVGSqC2olCw7keetca8y/7clHOLg0weAOWqtjtHUhUroivNl1PJuGzRN JvlB7Hc9ppnjQMkrbHFC9nezdFc6l64qKm38TzmzxAQ72chTbnFG+0mQuLzeFSEAko35 nip38IEVXCVt2N6MeXfYXZSD3CX8UZ/gamRwQQoxIiBdtfDdzb6uQ7CD8oiqP3/4N8OI TTNJbi2KtjJ3YRnDpnOYRKf6B4O5HsGK3hEcN26k3nyeTiFhrD9HHaNgJfHoSZf8dvCF ne66QVNsfsKFepiVfpniI8lxEjVGxI2kZkx7IehCn/Eo79j908MBdvVhjmD9RNaoLh25 HrnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=Oc8nntu2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t15si4554563ilg.47.2021.08.05.00.39.39; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=Oc8nntu2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238629AbhHEHhE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 03:37:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.120]:44094 "EHLO smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238273AbhHEHhD (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 03:37:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5143F347 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:36:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1628149009; bh=FkL9np5HE5mawBpGWfUQVMs1Jp3nZ1r2uXir2/3ncE4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Oc8nntu2s1I/sH9u0Ys5OwwSkRUrZ/9sSoexGgFm5QOHfcRBuigXHmNU0IM62epdD klE4/5jQ0ATH81HHCssh7EHv0GLU+JAVr3gv1tOBjJiom3cZft0a53/8ieQCNVQtag ie2fHmEmD+0mqbEC/dLIEINGUT8tYsP46iwFTTxirTkxI6U1qNYv4aksoa8tyfLIsl nk2aNhzd+baubu0DtTEEef11RQ5VPOeLNtXj1clqr2W/ALIlnJY69+dqTXfIsKFZhx 9tSwOkBiTw9XNjOBH3ZjXuxitIXuU1hBig4w+C0XLst/5bstd4LEBQ9LsZq4f2aGMM /K3CYSqZ81XXw== Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id dn10-20020a05640222eab02903bd023ea9f6so2701159edb.14 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FkL9np5HE5mawBpGWfUQVMs1Jp3nZ1r2uXir2/3ncE4=; b=lJXVCrwj7XqBCdyR0pqUhsflOEBaCtkSAn+WudNBUuRiouzV/gA0wu8sYn8DGRDucq 7KNGh31V8QWmVBHJFIehOMPrGMi3sNLCdAkuQFrKI8blg8/U9fRrrrjCcDakjwu3IcFN ByxYWayw3vfoi1QNRqpzS7VB9fAKFk/CkaDzF4sOgDGAQHPWjzSsNiNVMiz4glpP9Nsi qhJpymmHaIfe7ETp35PMUxmLF5DPRsGDrnPyN0vfC+ns/Mkbd12mgiwjin2uSFJUri9A vlqJSvsUuF6s9dXkspiH95XkREY+Ih0sclh0tevWbCobaR1J7mcBL9XKiXCs/jEBX9k/ TMhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AaFMtihZI0FnuXJZW5GBff5dslGnhV9XR5jqmWVxzMa6iD0ZT FL2695vs6CYGd7tghvhhFfBvrjLdqpDr/w+nhh57KlqSMryNYZWz+HZ9t/S5R7vxpF1Hn9AY6B/ IvT8oaAqFnJoKZNepj3GRvMuvojgBAeq8PLT10L6adA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c68e:: with SMTP id n14mr4845829edq.66.1628149008733; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c68e:: with SMTP id n14mr4845805edq.66.1628149008579; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.102] ([86.32.42.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm1403189eje.81.2021.08.05.00.36.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address range on Exynos7 To: Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alim Akhtar , Chanwoo Choi , Pankaj Dubey , Sam Protsenko , Marc Zyngier References: <20210805072110.4730-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:36:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210805072110.4730-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/08/2021 09:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The GIC-400 CPU interfaces address range is defined as 0x2000-0x3FFF (by > ARM). > I underestimated the issue - this is actually bug as there is a GICC_DIR register at offset 0x1000. Therefore: Fixes: b9024cbc937d ("arm64: dts: Add initial device tree support for exynos7") > Reported-by: Sam Protsenko > Reported-by: Marc Zyngier > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > index 8b06397ba6e7..c73a597ca66e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11001000 { > #address-cells = <0>; > interrupt-controller; > reg = <0x11001000 0x1000>, > - <0x11002000 0x1000>, > + <0x11002000 0x2000>, > <0x11004000 0x2000>, > <0x11006000 0x2000>; > }; > Best regards, Krzysztof