Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp411250pxt; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbRdPo9nCb4qQQRl2A53VCP2IQIB6YvUJRTsQMn6gokgXhVKUVTDyAGbMuehKioKC8So46 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:299:: with SMTP id l25mr5370307edv.283.1628156882689; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628156882; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MxzhJq5xOJfdhtol4Tf8W5hWFMS06dUEvuVxAILaLDl6uC4pOR3LK3xUudDHDQeEIj hgXuve9kcT8KYZkshr/FEhv67SHbPXqOtA0K79VsBILmMllpaF0vVf1aZiAL551z1cpv 3YOm/8layqUZjp/LYvAnZ26d6RV1Li1iijpnyT1aVntuPO4w32quE38FhcWc78AN/BvD 2SPzd+BevTUggvoC+DcXFI4VuOg8cgfthQ37mWN79hWVKadt2t/zYuLKow8RtZ1cpbUd Lgz024i3aPBp90UcS5bXLBtC5c64aPzVMGxRud443DmapVGpAwu17CTXrAeaRXVJe7dp FhFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=eq4sHLyLRo38xlokxNFSRX3L+vSvOngMzJAr9ypms3s=; b=yzHgOUv0hPYPmpdrc+PsC9Vb7wCUKUoafHjXVN/lL3E/aTJy55fCOk5fgQx3fD/+q0 tgupCDp+YIJawa6RFN++UYq0lbb3aefnpCUsWxTNcg/UDvoDLke+tGXSWsfVvk77AfRW 14RXqdhCHmXl1JJs5EQYpLsKAQd++nNwB4GPJnl1Mz7v3XVZTbeQfqX1dMLaaIAZHsh7 KoRWg6ReTk8xySf+XRZNmttCo5ua7dWB+UgcG/ILAeys9jAfncePGzvyKh05/qYk0DLU t9g9hMqvMOkKVB8UROYhdUVrkPmRek354A6rxWzajPCkcx7gWM5l04q6zY5cadRrP8Ep xbvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=OPKb2DxC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si1853009edf.583.2021.08.05.02.47.39; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=OPKb2DxC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239339AbhHEJpn (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 05:45:43 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.121]:59520 "EHLO smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239282AbhHEJpn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 05:45:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FAA840643 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1628156699; bh=eq4sHLyLRo38xlokxNFSRX3L+vSvOngMzJAr9ypms3s=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=OPKb2DxC/36Hqa0MkE1nj1RXl9YQzIsTK48/BNLgvYFhypSrCTW2Jk6jhP/3ehfkK CK0D5JXDKPU6Anigkshgtma8B3RVLpAL7OXxUjFExJyZ12akG4hlY8WuX6XXF/kk5N YFD0PB4ByoVnqMCtpbhELiW8O/RVRb1jiHgv8zXQ0snrjcuI9/xc8PLIdaf3QztMAN miRBqL5v9/bg6HgldELq3983MEOd4ivl5HYX/AcAu+gua8W4tVa+s0lqWLeRzoAfpK aFsC9XAMBP6abes92WKWbG95mln32pOTlFo+2WPisHWRlpXSi0634c7agAAr5FwcWT 9hDSm+dFkfj/Q== Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id l3-20020aa7c3030000b02903bccf1897f9so2855517edq.19 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:44:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eq4sHLyLRo38xlokxNFSRX3L+vSvOngMzJAr9ypms3s=; b=azdaiJwZlDBAj9VM/8N3Oi3mLxEyTADALBZp7GqtBm82VVcEmgjVjDgFi0o+62yMTJ XQy+wLJrRBiVPK8Ije/ioC5Yg2W1bSLS1sHb2guVA5KpZf0Xg0e7ftqUW2grvjDI4mj+ cVKERdQxSI6Qrf+770cusdjKMssNBXkrCXPw9IPZpmiVhGLxfbOJHVhPPI53NDymopQl l2mQ7GB+fHQWKOrVE0TanByGvGt6e6g9FPuTs+KwSyLhzLdQjAg4r/HwgLH71pxp+xE/ r82V4QevaENcB6XY7T2Jlekmz9irGnXHc04GVxNYCGLH42vLvWDf4B/5VDYLBVKvGAnV VNhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pb5MKIOosmU59VP04oKu5gDuzF1qiUKqxdwNKf2bqDEyQwXHN O0SrlwJdoRR58xN2Qa8yzfGiUJeywZ3XO8REO7XwgbawGkoSHzYh33UMJ+G5c5cjwq3Hs2RBpsa fhy4JgHGdTMWfMWGoEuBZANDUKqHQYy0WRxdN3C0OWA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:70a:: with SMTP id y10mr3852266ejb.381.1628156698746; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:44:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:70a:: with SMTP id y10mr3852248ejb.381.1628156698548; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.102] ([86.32.42.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm1506392ejg.31.2021.08.05.02.44.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address range on Exynos7 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Alim Akhtar , 'Rob Herring' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Chanwoo Choi' , 'Pankaj Dubey' , 'Sam Protsenko' , 'Marc Zyngier' References: <20210805072110.4730-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <03d701d789db$f275d290$d76177b0$@samsung.com> <7c019443-6153-f059-418b-3b268750f7a8@canonical.com> Message-ID: <4fc60199-44cd-41ea-9178-92b131d21b73@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:44:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7c019443-6153-f059-418b-3b268750f7a8@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/08/2021 11:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/08/2021 11:26, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> Sent: 05 August 2021 13:07 >>> To: Rob Herring ; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- >>> arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux- >>> kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: Alim Akhtar ; Chanwoo Choi >>> ; Pankaj Dubey ; >>> Sam Protsenko ; Marc Zyngier >>> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address >>> range on Exynos7 >>> >>> On 05/08/2021 09:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> The GIC-400 CPU interfaces address range is defined as 0x2000-0x3FFF >>>> (by ARM). >>>> >>> >> Looking at DDI0471B_gic400_r0p1_trm.pdf, CPU interface range is 0x0000 ~ 0x10000 >> >>> I underestimated the issue - this is actually bug as there is a GICC_DIR >>> register at offset 0x1000. Therefore: >>> >> Looking at the exynos7 and exynos5433 UMs looks like GICC_DIR is at offset 0x2100 (from 0x1100_0000 GIC base) >> It is possible for you to cross check once? >> > > That's a mistake in Exynos manual. GICC_DIR is at 0x1000: 0x1000 from CPU base offset, so 0x3000 from GIC base. > https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0471/b/programmers-model/cpu-interface-register-summary > > We have discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/0277c701-cc25-cdc5-d3b9-cf2cc2ba4de5@canonical.com/T/#m1ced9a28bed27f5cf74e281fb68efe1b57d5609e > > Range of 0x10000 is definitely wrong as it overlaps with two other > ranges. Best regards, Krzysztof