Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp589308pxt; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxi+v7eLzK9japE1aBNbBd5m32XtRzmHXV/6Ehtca27Tg4rh72kl3PFbL8kAQ/SZ1+oMe5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c20d:: with SMTP id d13mr4854938ejz.259.1628172301669; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628172301; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SbSggveFuvAjuqpvzGh5ax69TDSp3qUpehEjEUKoMPShgfccEJ61rFIAqteDG9x1MA 5dQkbMrNJbefADxfOCzEhQcSUVXCi4C+MYSZwfVDj3PH2wSjfc8EHEITS+e85jvD8e6c 4/82CZ0Xr4VgTkq4DqRKjKP20sKsJGbrhrTgEhGvfs3hwYn9vLa/MI1EMiK7qyU+BeqO visVj6oU34+Yz0LBv9+fyOUrubH/f838m2QH7fLy0IWFEM3nDNVP1jcjpmJDr9CG8VFr VFG/P4uLKKNIGw1FwmT96OjocL7/c3bhXmz7/zwrqwABZB0n/UXvppVYQWXESbn5CBtg R+VA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=UnQ03oOngNmEkX2RgYECAHu+zjiI5dLikqmWa8ZL0fs=; b=a1VAwVGSUU0gfjNyPCWVhF/bzb1ZxtTJTn3Gk4QS3TfQXCfMUIGwkaeNzvoew+A32+ RCO0RPGBDPwJ8tmbzmCu+z+QQ7WcNpvs2tfybrYv6J4JzFfa6kWu8HqogqEnw4gMY+kL PIOPJ/id1L+sNmyF8lGCOFW6oecBXcJSWaLEk775xRlTIv1wATflZ6fH2EKywOK6LHK7 zYU3QKqEp7JpnZ7DNTsFi28fX0WmtjGXQ2sPRvvLPdA2v3C5BZkf82mseQFCXXi4UAiy o6dpseAOxsuGt2U2xSwDjIzM2kQBivFHFNEavlIhVstVgx71wVgPQEKPVn9dqSn8tsb1 fn7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UDFSEnFX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hb12si6163529ejc.319.2021.08.05.07.03.56; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UDFSEnFX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241428AbhHEMqG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:46:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240545AbhHEMqF (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:46:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7857DC061765; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 05:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id cl16-20020a17090af690b02901782c35c4ccso5324390pjb.5; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 05:45:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UnQ03oOngNmEkX2RgYECAHu+zjiI5dLikqmWa8ZL0fs=; b=UDFSEnFX+P4D9dsBIpJXdiBDvFFosSFjV5A69fRAMBpYEuPR/kPhRSQT3t5X9zzZKT Vrm2OtKTz8EhYg6VE+HJJYVkvpoPT20eHrl0bUD9R3aKUqckaqhXIqKySeliUj954Ml2 bZddEqAIyd2Os0Nw/zD4AzC/gPjf4LGKvd9l0mFEOcajMDhklpqkyzKbTfbc9dTAl0Eu 2MbKnuC0XAVQoUzGUQUs3NDbtWnkaT9siO8g5mXDko/Y58pnN40zMNu/dUsbw5FSj24u sXHacU7T0WuWEKWp4GJzAz/mJlcviQzTggQVQiEuKbTK/sHfxPpTM7KK9whHv0N7d0MS Sj7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UnQ03oOngNmEkX2RgYECAHu+zjiI5dLikqmWa8ZL0fs=; b=mo+0QLA/3run/+qB5PSu6l7C2HY2HUisHwAMuDn2PG16qHWZ5k92FK8Lrme6jvBIZF 8XsXU0nX83Ihx5RGliIQVYuZUjrsJTHmEfMIGkYxQUwi6w81ZwjyF2TYzAVnVOM8FIxa 9PWdtQm3zXpqF2tlFtBad6k3+i0QEkiM2gspcuD+E/C28zEjn06aqMmtWYqt9l6bZ3FI xcwjIg90I66p90fxhg+xVpaAN/MGM8BDPZjHlSWkNsxQrc/J5pZTtXnLjsZNFqqvwqKc efhxvbYTgILhN26Uenmpz4iY2OAuAjU6/CRJI/wCnptQ+gB83diryfI6Ma8KJC65wZZ3 pV0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xjirdHaLyKjlF56GvDv+xgdN/hFkWEZL0OI2n00dIA40jZQ7H bx0C8wAE6QXocCTC0yAuN28= X-Received: by 2002:a62:878c:0:b029:3c5:f729:ef00 with SMTP id i134-20020a62878c0000b02903c5f729ef00mr4911562pfe.43.1628167550056; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 05:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2404:f801:0:5:8000::4b1? ([2404:f801:9000:18:efec::4b1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm1983191pji.56.2021.08.05.05.45.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Hyper-V: Initialize Hyper-V stimer after enabling lapic To: Praveen Kumar , kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, sthemmin@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, michael.h.kelley@microsoft.com Cc: Tianyu Lan , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com References: <20210804184843.513524-1-ltykernel@gmail.com> From: Tianyu Lan Message-ID: <4ceb1504-205a-26fc-2fec-2d87f8601b31@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:45:43 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Praveen: Thanks for your review. On 8/5/2021 2:41 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote: >> + >> +static void __init hv_setup_initr_mode(void) >> +{ >> + if (old_setup_initr_mode) >> + old_setup_initr_mode(); >> + >> + /* >> + * The direct-mode STIMER depends on LAPIC and so allocate >> + * STIMER after calling initr node callback. >> + */ >> + (void)hv_stimer_alloc(false); > In my understanding, in previous implementation we were ignoring the return error as there was a fallback handling for LAPIC. > However, I'm not seeing the same here, or am I missing something ? > Nice catch. The original comment should be keep and will add back in the next version.