Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:47:51 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     "quanyang.wang" <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
Cc:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>,
        Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to
 make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible
Message-ID: <20210806004751.GU26252@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20210730031753.1317917-1-quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
 <e639bfc1-ce6f-c5d3-6412-70d03706127d@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="msgLTjjeumHWYklJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e639bfc1-ce6f-c5d3-6412-70d03706127d@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--msgLTjjeumHWYklJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:41:41AM +0800, quanyang.wang wrote:
> ping.

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

--msgLTjjeumHWYklJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmEMhrcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9BAkQf/XzqzDaswEkmzzfYPCGH2UHyvags44BukN9JEi3TbVUfxPl0fiGJPX3Kw
60fLwAkhvh1q9aXtDwkb4CdUod2mXFQDIpONil6EZrTlx8TQ2WFJ/VrAnNNXAQ3I
KiJNUlF7SIogdvLfMbAgN9F7HusIjSCL394xe2QfgvpisXSJGwRcjgXHqKFY8cEI
33m/2bVvGqThj0YS8F87/lSFbEmnnvZE1/tcc7kS0l1y/aiZ5pKwCo570GdYSdhr
HmPXGBSKKKCDg3VxKc2BH4zMZbbkwtR9DpvrNvr5gKFqUw/nkocgvQppu2QsJbA7
VDcEWDEkn2ebe5v24TZFr/WNAueh8w==
=CSVE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--msgLTjjeumHWYklJ--