Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:42:11 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
        "Weight, Russell H" <russell.h.weight@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: region: handle compat_id as an uuid
Message-ID: <20210806014211.GC461389@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
References: <ba28bac6-9c6d-de73-523f-b8ba4bef84de@redhat.com>
 <DM6PR11MB38199F872DC94971D9C8A53885EA9@DM6PR11MB3819.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <YQL4qyAmqj322HTz@epycbox.lan>
 <a5b4b303-7d9b-27d7-4c1e-cd29fea8cdb9@redhat.com>
 <20210730014859.GA436611@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
 <dd2bc08b-3610-b14f-59fc-ab444845d0f7@redhat.com>
 <20210803033224.GA461389@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
 <fa35d07e-f455-a9c9-1d01-b115d114de9b@redhat.com>
 <20210804014455.GB461389@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
 <12d6563a-6cdc-490d-81fb-6699bc9d2d4b@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12d6563a-6cdc-490d-81fb-6699bc9d2d4b@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 06:21:55AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> 
> On 8/3/21 6:44 PM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:21:54AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > On 8/2/21 8:32 PM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 05:07:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > > > On 7/29/21 6:48 PM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:16:47PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > > > > > On 7/29/21 11:51 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:36:56AM +0000, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/21 3:12 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 7/26/21 1:26 PM, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > An fpga region's compat_id is exported by the sysfs
> > > > > > > > > > > > as a 128 bit hex string formed by concatenating two
> > > > > > > > > > > > 64 bit values together.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > The only user of compat_id is dfl.  Its user library
> > > > > > > > > > > > opae converts this value into a uuid.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > ex/
> > > > > > > > > > > > $ cat /sys/class/fpga_region/region1/compat_id
> > > > > > > > > > > > f3c9941350814aadbced07eb84a6d0bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Is reported as
> > > > > > > > > > > > $ fpgainfo bmc
> > > > > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > > > > Pr Interface Id                  : f3c99413-5081-4aad-bced-07eb84a6d0bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Storing a uuid as 2 64 bit values is vendor specific.
> > > > > > > > > > > > And concatenating them together is vendor specific.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > It is better to store and print out as a vendor neutral uuid.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Change fpga_compat_id from a struct to a union.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Keep the old 64 bit values for dfl.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sysfs output is now
> > > > > > > > > > > > f3c99413-5081-4aad-bced-07eb84a6d0bb
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm fowarding feedback from Tim Whisonant, one of the OPAE userspace
> > > > > > > > > > > developers:
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > I think that this change to the sysfs for the compat_id node will
> > > > > > > > > > > end up breaking the SDK, which does not expect the '-' characters to
> > > > > > > > > > > be included when parsing the sysfs value. Currently, it is parsed as
> > > > > > > > > > > a raw hex string without regard to any '-' characters. This goes for
> > > > > > > > > > > any "guid" currently exported by sysfs and for what we read in the
> > > > > > > > > > > device MMIO space.
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, it will.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > And there are other places, like dfl-afu-main.c:afu_id_show()
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > outputs raw hex that sdk turns into a uuid.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Some options.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > If no one but dfl will ever use it, then v1 of patchset.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > If others can use it but don't want to change dfl, then v2 of patchset,
> > > > > > > > > > my favorite.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Or this one for uuid for everyone, what have been v3 but changed too much.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > could dfl change generally to output uuid's to the sysfs ?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > this would be generally helpful and a one time disruption to the sdk.
> > > > > > > > > This change limited the output format to uuid_t, but if any hardware doesn't
> > > > > > > > > use uuid_t on hardware may have to convert it back from the sysfs output in
> > > > > > > > > userspace. Leave it to print hardware values (e.g. from register), and convert
> > > > > > > > > it in userspace should be fine too I think.
> > > > > > > > I'm not entirely sure. I seem to recall there being examples of sysfs
> > > > > > > > files returning different things for different drivers.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > That being said it seems largely cosmetic to add the '-' in between.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > If it breaks userspace, I'm against it. If you *need* it make a
> > > > > > > > compat_uuid entry or something in that case?
> > > > > > > My gripe is
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > For a nominally common interface, compat_id has a vendor specific output.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If for example another vendor wanted to use this field but their natural
> > > > > > > format was an OF string.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 16 bytes of raw hex would not work for them, so they would roll their own.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > which defeats the purpose of a common interface.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The language in the docs as-is is vague on the output format.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > DFL is the only user of the interface.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > So ver 2
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/4ab7dd2d-c215-6333-6860-6f7d0ac64c3d@redhat.com/
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Keeps the output as-is for dfl, so nothing breaks in userspace
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And adds flexibility for vendors to output their appropriate natural form.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > So compat_id becomes generally useful.
> > > > > > Mixing types seems be strongly against in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst.
> > > > > > So in my opinion there should be a determined format for the output. The
> > > > > > concern for this patch is which one is a better format, uuid style or
> > > > > > 128 bit raw hex?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > And I vote for 128 bit raw hex, as other vendors may not use uuid_t as
> > > > > > the identifier, may be an OF string. So we don't have to force them
> > > > > > decorate it as the uuid style.
> > > > > So you would be ok with v2 of this patchset ?
> > > > No. I prefer we keep the current implementation. I mean 128 bit raw hex
> > > > could be a more compatible output format for all vendors, uuid style,
> > > > string style or others.
> > > How would 128 bit raw hex be compatible if a vendor's natural format was an
> > > OF string ?
> > > 
> > > Why would they even use compat_id ?
> > As I mentioned before, I assume there should be a unified output format
> > for all vendors. So we need to choose one from raw hex, uuid_t, string
> > and all other formats. Raw hex is the fundamental format, which could be
> > further interpreted by user as a uuid_t, a string or other objects.
> 
> Having one format is not a requirement, the format is not listed in the
> docs.

My understanding comes from the "Mixing types" description in
Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt, I assume a sysfs node should not
output different data types in different conditions.

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
> How would converting an OF string to hex work and why would a vendor want to
> display it as hex ?
> 
> For the user, instead of reading an OF string directly they would be
> required to decrypt it.
> 
> So it they had a compat_id they would not use this one, they would stick it
> somewhere else.
> 
> Defeating the purpose of a having it a common area.
> 
> Tom
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yilun
> > 
> > > Tom
> > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Yilun
> > > > 
> > > > > Tom
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Yilun
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Tom
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > - Moritz
> > > > > > > >