Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp478855pxt; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwuXamzQms9747lzaezhxuAn72lpXoDph6ihm47yClUH58bGIDxXWY2MuXb14n5Vp3ON3U X-Received: by 2002:a5d:85cf:: with SMTP id e15mr1030033ios.208.1628257180598; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628257180; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jVlqgFBHLvotuOB6zMZYasHtEwrIBAjkzsv5fFhlnVu0N639FauOFQaP+ZgIyrryu0 WPXdmYZsMYw2OosJKDUneKbrZs+uli1BjwK6PK6fmMQyVy1CzIcxrHV+A1xI24B+TLQJ pzRINzL+wbokVoKp4cTGUHOc7E4SAQPywYCgT4M9XA3Ulg06qQoF3cVhENk5knvhez6x H56OO4Mi6TUdHq+RfBouNcsqpjyPVPDxYV68atju1RWMiY7gE4Ts1yJm7vBzX4XVCeNg Nv4hYE2CtKqij+I+PheXFIEp7+pXd4XllArycjbNqnvHlSLy7YiJBYIBXNwy9/8jcCXa whSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=1HYiLUHByxb6crRomDT7sMTTfUf9/VPHla2c1ebzSuQ=; b=pHzQRVNg8eELwbRG8K6gv3zy9t86uSjgI6D131Wl0fuMbIIDUn5tLFJO0dK8VqL2cQ NCVvYLkC7Th1RJM62Gncq7h+hsQRHfA2HJvE+y/MA7KJOCwur5q5llyXTCPr/BtRHJN8 36dqNUy2XGAyHDiSw+sGx9ri607xNGHNqH1T8fXYiCmQDfn58BqJmwYM57vJ3X4N/UoH /7ap+s+DHl8VjqjgFlb2lEZghkLGngrDNY0TU6Omk4xLosssgnYxCWiAI0OgYZl+bmc3 zymD7WHcpO+FoIFgbfHVxO+QszScbFvdEgEQ8ywWnf/h4fIm6osEXwjkFLKlVHQ2rdKS lDMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=L9mk7BMc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y13si9130164ioq.14.2021.08.06.06.39.26; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=L9mk7BMc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244463AbhHFIXt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 04:23:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51244 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244046AbhHFIT6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 04:19:58 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F418611B0; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:19:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1628237983; bh=5lHkBiYBFeKOx5Gni0RJ9k5BaU9aFOWCBxYfN8/mlak=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L9mk7BMcun8I+Zg/XmAhjDYE1+xV18DGtYpFQY2qSVecpKyXrGW1h+dyV6XGFzI3J rG8ptZeSuv4y7sDIC//LpN/9/pDPC9YJGrNHxIWmYiyQsia+Yh/Eqi3L2c6ub1HbAO Yy7ud8CA+RYlQ902Tqxr0p6CVYeXJzo0B9wjIjAs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Ovidiu Panait Subject: [PATCH 5.10 28/30] bpf: Update selftests to reflect new error states Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:17:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20210806081114.076841904@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210806081113.126861800@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210806081113.126861800@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Borkmann commit d7a5091351756d0ae8e63134313c455624e36a13 upstream Update various selftest error messages: * The 'Rx tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types' is reworked into more specific/differentiated error messages for better guidance. * The change into 'value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds' is due to moving the mixed bounds check into the speculation handling and thus occuring slightly later than above mentioned sanity check. * The change into 'math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded min value' is similarly due to register sanity check coming before the mixed bounds check. * The case of 'map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps' now loads fine given masks are the same from the different paths (despite max map value size being different). Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 5 -- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c | 21 +++++----- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c | 13 ------ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 4 - tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c | 2 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 6 -- 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", .result = REJECT, }, @@ -298,9 +296,6 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, - /* not actually fully unbounded, but the bound is very high */ - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it prohibited for !root", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds", .result = REJECT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_deduction.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", .result = REJECT, }, @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, @@ -34,22 +34,23 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", .result = REJECT, }, { "check deducing bounds from const, 4", .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R6 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, @@ -61,7 +62,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", .result = REJECT, }, @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", .result = REJECT, }, @@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar", .result = REJECT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -43,7 +42,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -69,7 +67,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -94,7 +91,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -141,7 +137,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -210,7 +205,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -260,7 +254,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -287,7 +280,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -313,7 +305,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -342,7 +333,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -372,7 +362,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 4 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -400,7 +389,5 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 }, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -93,6 +93,6 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 }, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation", .result = ACCEPT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 5 }, .fixup_map_array_48b = { 8 }, .result = ACCEPT, - .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps", .retval = 1, }, { @@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different pointers or scalars", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -169,7 +167,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types", + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps, paths or scalars", .retval = 0, }, {