Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linuxwwan@intel.com
References: <0545a78f-63f0-f8dd-abdb-1887c65e1c79@siemens.com>
From:   "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <eb8fa6ad-10c8-e035-9bd8-1caf470e739e@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:59:20 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0545a78f-63f0-f8dd-abdb-1887c65e1c79@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jan,

What is the context of this request ?

FYI, the driver upstreamed is for M.2 7560.

Regards,
Chetan

On 8/6/2021 2:09 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Chetan,
> 
> at the risk of having missed this being answered already:
> 
> How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline?
> 
> There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard
> userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from
> common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible
> interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that
> hardware or its firmware too different?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> [1] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci
>