Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp820375pxt; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:52:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnhv3gh0gMVbJgTi52AcWkUTkgv/y+qqIDCv0x3J4TAsRMxxFPQmDkhpICRd4+gMA2Mw4t X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94c6:: with SMTP id dn6mr12087002ejc.287.1628286761400; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:52:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628286761; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XG8ECdIXeaxmsmEGqyoGgrlw7hg84L9xa/2sMpRwnxFJOXPbzruyufY9ZyjqkAHQN5 qUUrsNMNRchM8PqO5lVSxReJl3tGj+6ZnZP/G7efwH1jhrt2+jSdIJDyizQ9cZfc3Evo fQ2tM9hBMHdzwPRI98rnvMLw0jBqeyYaWxgmEGF5DgVaY4nJs0vlpUor2l08Yz5rAyft V1PoXLNOvp5RW4A5qKeOTWagBeV7H/7OXWUoZ4xg7V2y3q1K+aAwBPuzmgLKlk5bo/vQ TL292gvXaKkOoCClFod7f+Y7BNVZM+q6ifRt4lIipUNA7U4ed+bHG18KXv6/aOgxMKJt RtTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=tQyvLpV9LfQvBsYcuMqj2Ctj++omX7wrGZr+D1duO6M=; b=IGumPP4LWp+VkXXqdkbIGoukfU044qSwfOyHpDjzL/Lj8m99zB4Gv8/Zt41VmiMrW5 n7RiKVSe2wKsSCIZrbETIF4VFZ1jjK5GLdM2XFhcBzeA39XyVmIOxtWVqYxDiuwZQw7i crQ0niAeBSBshWWJF1M4xUDq1sIM278GGbT3vp+sEKn0hC10NLqmZsuXaYpiY5gl26KL 6CMxo9vM3U6oM/QimioCBhr4tiktseomguyHVsdiIvccdIxSKQkPWaVRo1jh3fh6qk6u 3TjXmbkl3zRVKduQpwL9uj937Y5EHjhypTtmMk6FYKwM1DS9SZa46T6XgigyNKmmlEX7 y/Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k9si10266337edv.565.2021.08.06.14.52.18; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240018AbhHFOeh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:34:37 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:39923 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239972AbhHFOeh (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 10:34:37 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 176EQjC0006372; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:26:45 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 176EQikA006370; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:26:44 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:26:43 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Michael Ellerman Cc: sxwjean@me.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, Xiongwei Song , oleg@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efremov@linux.com, paulus@samba.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, peterx@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sandipan@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Optimize register usage for esr register Message-ID: <20210806142643.GU1583@gate.crashing.org> References: <20210726143053.532839-1-sxwjean@me.com> <874kc3njxh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874kc3njxh.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 04:53:14PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > But I'm not sure about the use of anonymous unions in UAPI headers. Old > compilers don't support them, so there's a risk of breakage. More precisely, it exists only since C11, so even with all not-so-ancient compilers it will not work if the user uses (say) -std=c99, which still is popular. > I'd rather we didn't touch the uapi version. Yeah. > > - err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr); > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_4xx) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOKE)) > > + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->esr); > > + else > > + err = ___do_page_fault(regs, regs->dar, regs->dsisr); > > As Christophe said, I don't thinks this is an improvement. > > It makes the code less readable. If anyone is confused about what is > passed to ___do_page_fault() they can either read the comment above it, > or look at the definition of pt_regs to see that esr and dsisr share > storage. Esp. since the affected platforms are legacy, yup. Segher