Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935957AbWK2R7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:59:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935976AbWK2R7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:59:19 -0500 Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.151]:21447 "EHLO mtagate2.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935957AbWK2R7S (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:59:18 -0500 Message-ID: <456DCA6A.9000903@fr.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:59:06 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Mishin CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Cedric Le Goater , Kirill Korotaev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Herbert Poetzl , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework References: <4563007B.9010202@fr.ibm.com> <200611221955.56942.dim@openvz.org> <20061123023943.GA22931@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <200611231207.40634.dim@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: <200611231207.40634.dim@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1737 Lines: 39 Dmitry Mishin wrote: > On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:39, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org): >>> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com): >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Dmitry Mishin wrote: >>>>>> This patch looks acceptable for us. >>>>> good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below. >>>>> >>>>>> BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do >>>>>> not see a reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work >>>>>> and move existent patchset over his interface. >>>>> yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's >>>>> more in >>>> Where is Andrey's patch? >>> This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666 >> Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before. >> >> That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with >> the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for >> refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your >> own mechanism for unsharing. >> >> It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever >> practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to >> fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor? > No. I've already said, Cedric's patch is acceptable for us. Do you mind if we port your patchset on top of this patch ? If you have no time for that I can do it. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/