Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp906797pxt; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:36:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUcy77ac6Vfc/TfgyH7eS01DuxZca/cgSXzJILAXPsJMf87CbUqR9ha6LHH2rU1zD/PCGH X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1e06:: with SMTP id g6mr795612ila.41.1628296606208; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 17:36:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628296606; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=m1uz7Jng+7GThD6rwBvsrBK7s7MYV6YjU9gKPiIFPhHQRkUlo4pxGFzq7h4cNP/PIZ VN6f+bbvyhmQeER/DqIiKH4XpA3rboV88KzHfGR9eHsCmOpxjNhLqZZDJUibzbQneTFq xNGLzoywId8TnUXqynTw5+ar2urbqQIp16kKQYFBYdTx6C/DkWTcAfrenfh/n3kPZUTZ L5IOt4PKC5XNqpiB65uOfJVyOk7Gp2gtoonfaHw8Fqgzcw2GDrbUhgxZTjl+hUy66JZV uH9RZfIEi7ac7N9XVA8dv8bpuyHgz3jYa8992QKtSJ/xmJ6WFQCndga7dJ9Xz5F/0eUQ eR+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=8c66UGoz7B8pWXFBL5gsAX5HaexYO4fRq50QyOEE4gA=; b=gI2jBfQga27twIoXlCa1cLD58dwkaHN0YuPEBflSWDgwFDcaiD3ITinrEGNtohRwIT JE8FXOps7yTi6G+PtNQqaEtkm29YrpKMzaePE5ym0kNAMtfClq0AKix2q+URljmhin0Z bty47JyqnLjRy+0w5GdiRWRQuZI8hKhoqJHDWRlEMYsZ4bk0d5T02JZx8BppaPXlW5xm jiq5qKURmYzFfk8oJcT0dykx/KqpAROTNGqTxupAhbfqaEbrcpToJXnMlYkhGJ0lWlLA BhPa3qYjbkXZhcKyhsSJ4FVkwIS5c6lK+vSHaD9b16k5f7CMLZ05ePVIKQ63onG5ZdCH julA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c126si3556033iof.49.2021.08.06.17.36.34; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 17:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229707AbhHGAfT (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 20:35:19 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42446 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229379AbhHGAfT (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2021 20:35:19 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E731B; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.122.166] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A37FA3F66F; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI/ACPI: Add new quirk detection, enable bcm2711 To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, nsaenz@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210806221256.GA1891371@bjorn-Precision-5520> From: Jeremy Linton Message-ID: <5f4f484b-9eef-2722-405d-a7ff6259aa0f@arm.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 19:34:56 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210806221256.GA1891371@bjorn-Precision-5520> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks for looking at this. On 8/6/21 5:12 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > In subject, this or similar would match history: > > PCI/ACPI: Add Broadcom bcm2711 MCFG quirk > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:12:00PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: >> Now that we have a bcm2711 quirk, we need to be able to >> detect it when the MCFG is missing. Use a namespace >> property as an alternative to the MCFG OEM. > > Rewrap to use ~75 columns. > > Mention the DT namespace property here. > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton >> --- >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> index 53cab975f612..7d77fc72c2a4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = { >> ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 13), >> ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 14), >> ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 15), >> + >> + { "bcm2711", "", 0, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &bcm2711_pcie_ops, >> + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0xFD500000, 0xA000) }, >> }; >> >> static char mcfg_oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE]; >> @@ -198,8 +201,19 @@ static void pci_mcfg_apply_quirks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, >> u16 segment = root->segment; >> struct resource *bus_range = &root->secondary; >> struct mcfg_fixup *f; >> + const char *soc; >> int i; >> >> + /* >> + * This could be a machine with a PCI/SMC conduit, >> + * which means it doens't have MCFG. Get the machineid from >> + * the namespace definition instead. > > s/SMC/SMCCC/ ? Cover letter uses SMCCC (not sure it's relevant anyway) > s/doens't/doesn't/ > > Rewrap comment to use ~80 columns. > > Seems pretty reasonable that a platform without standard ECAM might > not have MCFG, since MCFG basically implies ECAM. Sure, on all the above comments. > > Is "linux,pcie-quirk" the right property to look for? It doesn't > sound very generic, and it doesn't sound like anything related to > ECAM. Is it new? I don't see it in the tree yet. Should it be in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci.txt so we don't get a > different property name for every new platform? Yes, I made it up. Someone else commented about the "linux," partially because it should be "linux-" to conform with https://github.com/UEFI/DSD-Guide. But also in the same context of it being linux specific. I think that guide is where it should end up, rather than the devicetree bindings. I guess we can request addition to the uefi- but that seems like a mistake this is really (hopefully?) a Linux specific properly as other OS's will simply use the SMC. I think we could request another prefix if we come up with a good one and think it belongs in that guide. > >> + */ >> + if (!fwnode_property_read_string(acpi_fwnode_handle(root->device), >> + "linux,pcie-quirk", &soc)) { >> + memcpy(mcfg_oem_id, soc, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE); >> + } >> + >> for (i = 0, f = mcfg_quirks; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mcfg_quirks); i++, f++) { >> if (pci_mcfg_quirk_matches(f, segment, bus_range)) { >> if (f->cfgres.start) >> -- >> 2.31.1 >>