Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com;
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/11] hte: Add tegra194 HTE kernel provider
From:   Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
References: <20210625235532.19575-1-dipenp@nvidia.com>
 <20210625235532.19575-4-dipenp@nvidia.com> <20210701142156.GA34285@sol>
 <52768891-6c01-7588-e557-5c9eae5375b6@nvidia.com>
 <20210731154323.GA24906@sol>
 <1ff6df66-9895-bd42-322a-515327f30366@nvidia.com> <20210807030746.GA9850@sol>
 <91a173b3-18dc-5d6b-002f-893e7478717b@nvidia.com>
 <20210807045116.GA13675@sol>
 <7f6a2591-c264-e005-18ae-242320d4a22e@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <b0e18731-f96d-2558-c7df-56be380ff67a@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 22:47:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7f6a2591-c264-e005-18ae-242320d4a22e@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2021 05:38:39.7721
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6d90c387-53f6-4a97-3c19-08d959659c54
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.112.34];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT066.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR12MB2946
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 8/6/21 10:35 PM, Dipen Patel wrote:
> On 8/6/21 9:51 PM, Kent Gibson wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:52:54PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>> On 8/6/21 8:07 PM, Kent Gibson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 07:41:09PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>>>> On 7/31/21 8:43 AM, Kent Gibson wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 04:59:08PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks Kent for the review comment. My responses inline.
>>>>>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> 2. Does hte handler solution create race between two handlers? i.e. edge_irq_handler and
>>>>>
>>>>> hte_handler, for the worst case scenario as below?
>>>>>
>>>> No.  If hardware timestamp is selected then no irq is requested from the
>>>> irq subsystem for that line - only from the hte subsystem instead.
>>>> So there will be no edge_irq_handler call for that line, so no possible race.
>>> That is not possible for certain providers, for example the one I am dealing
>>>
>>> with which requires GPIO line to be requested as input and IRQ needs to
>>>
>>> be enabled on them.
>>>
>> So, for your hte subsystem to work, the consumer has to also request
>> a line from the irq subsystem?
> Yes
>
>>   That makes sense to you?
> Its not me, its peculiarity of the hardware that I am dealing with.
>> Have hte do that, rather than the consumer.
> Sure, for cdev it would mean to duplicate (most of) the edge* or line_create
>
> code in HTE.

Ignore code duplicate comment, shouldn't be big deal.


> For such hardware, my initial doubt remains the same about
>
> the worst case scenario between two handlers, but perhaps that's
>
> implementation details for hte to handle.
>
>> And another reason it makes sense to integrate this with irq...
> Alright, will explore this route as well. I remember both Thierry[1] and
>
> Marc[2] raised some doubts (time to revive that discussion).
>
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YFm9r%2FtFkzVlYDEp@orome.fritz.box/
>
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87h7l1k9yi.wl-maz@kernel.org/
>
>> Cheers,
>> Kent.