Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp1325492pxt; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1O/hVq/zxUxhQ2RYZ1gM98V749+5AvbZroZ8qFvPIyt3yj2Z8XK++G45Du1ZCxiUbUmXE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:739d:: with SMTP id f29mr14969848ejl.41.1628346195422; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628346195; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tvdQopY83AZFSc6j+Y/Hi9xwyioyPmsDE2jYEfQrMUV5vTLJKIMWHDnI56qW/b7F9C GbqoT/g8UTaIuHXukaeTnjvO3lzgQhmcR8UhaEknCpgWmkUhk1KDMSZk+eYB8SoZdR8q 9zXuzmUQzgv8Kj4vfxxL/D043N59SuImfjNRSTUYd+CMdfGO2OJkLR9RjrJie7p3z26e q0aN2ToEtEDfQ5T1gepCzaZ8mRjdkLLf6BG7LIkQknrToMKVKvqfBpvDvODe+XwfHY50 T3QlVnHHRgqvdmSKIf0FLcEANTrkx/fAraAXJVtdroAJcsbqVDai1fNOQotGa5UJaQIH Cy/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Xk437ZK+XzJVD1Kge5a4sgFw8KUmaw3G46w6ax86i/I=; b=ABxN6R+dYQuhIwfEdCBaV6U8TbGspZV9NVVFNGAsCPrF1aFbhZr5aUiFiZ8Au4IXyA X1rUmN6e//WVnBVjgfzASwKWYiW01TpZ8Mt0qc636WyGVQU47bgbIc1oQDuwRgfGsaYD MCVNkmD2dAkchbFKmBUAA9uR4shXolXVCtvKw7nLMzbLPCo7AADtIpgMylw2eefPBsj9 8GPC4YMm4CTfMpLMcfwb+98Og8T65990tSJ+oy6lUpZDIooiyQGRyYixaEo+2GP/dH3Y Z8JxCnA1jBSOKG+6hT8bZq6jiueTVcUdoiyZ75Q8MDHNlQCaZgrdS8Z6zwCzRux1HN8E fDxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=GmyXZz2H; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17si11271578edq.35.2021.08.07.07.22.51; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=GmyXZz2H; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232420AbhHGOUV (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:20:21 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:38142 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232372AbhHGOTi (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:19:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=Xk437ZK+XzJVD1Kge5a4sgFw8KUmaw3G46w6ax86i/I=; b=GmyXZz2H5ziYlbr6jxmAVr9z2Y P7ytkcrsbv2z6cjobDfvcCyFvs77S64MsD3oo7tOiBy/uKsiiKRMcuxf7dP+QyrZfg3IWz3iTqiuf 3VFAviN9Pn7cGIe/ozCzi0ZLdkJNqR++0M3v0zqsWxJslY2hI2EwSxMdAk37Zty48D1E=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mCN8y-00GVAU-RT; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 16:17:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:17:44 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Michael Walle Cc: Daniel Golle , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: add missing for ETH_ALEN Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > What kernel is this? I've just tested with this exact commit as > base and it compiles just fine. > > I'm not saying including the file is wrong, but it seems it isn't > needed in the upstream kernel and I don't know if it qualifies for > the stable queue therefore. I would like to see a reproducer for mainline. Do you have a kernel config which generates the problem. The change itself does seems reasonable, so if we can reproduce it, i would be happy to merge it for stable. Andrew