Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp1521519pxt; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw13qsf7uEKMUTnzHxCV6ZfGle3TcwAYilWRDplpAh73DzSRRsbk078xVuOxCKV95jgi/89 X-Received: by 2002:a92:c7c4:: with SMTP id g4mr279827ilk.252.1628370100588; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628370100; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WnlEt1HEe7JBni1dJo8B0RByqcCKkOXWjdNtzi0dX7n64r+ohz4RKC2TKgelvpJJoM mrViaMeyeuT4Hp9K/eRpNvt0uEnoMSikPJL+mrUUvRz1qT9Z5Y2npOuqKyWEXHlPw3Bm sDs1N/EmgloeDZpd06CkzpLWoyf+wN9n1AG+564iBIfciMshsZ+/K8yqCU7m1Z9E3xsX kTt1P6/cx82VMgaoYRpZ03oCjm4ByxWq3JaJwxxvqYfYwC+5DLULgYFj1MybSfXAz22p B8Lp6EDLzYAIebjiKSDuadWs0fSROyt1rB4QD2L+vomnHyy9yxfOBo+3p+PqCRyDSHj2 oZKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=aDPS+XgQ7hE35dLkgpgBaogFW2sWOGSB2/ljVEyiaXE=; b=QhkPH5SGXBQpzKpiBmiMT5uYb0/qp5cVqDd/use6a1XIUuBLicKMahjRZ3kxKxWK/e kdlMA/we4YflqoKCHG6gEfn6PI6kwgKvHZaU4zXLE67qATSvTCaggt04vcXBhxc8I0EM CC95Bb3wqXbBqXFeV6DmRxGySejmuyjYwnGf1/ouWOt35Q7dwo9AjfKqRP1HhTCBIOkC A1od7mrbTabtCmDJ/YtU2y22G3ZHh/qFQRnnQS7zeqjmWiStdAUm+gFPP4UNY+I25Utw 7p9jAWGVO3VkchDxzCJ+aimY+zDG5WNc4+aE4FSixCJNb4WML70HBtFn8xmZwoTLJdIc 2GgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QkN+d27N; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x14si12932088jab.2.2021.08.07.14.01.28; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QkN+d27N; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229797AbhHGU5J (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:57:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35314 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229517AbhHGU5H (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 16:57:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF318C0613CF; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id k11-20020a17090a62cbb02901786a5edc9aso4314106pjs.5; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aDPS+XgQ7hE35dLkgpgBaogFW2sWOGSB2/ljVEyiaXE=; b=QkN+d27NFol80qPk1x1PjEoadt867p+EnfVJEqQr3mIcvz03YJ3gO1J6bUhpUlgSBC HRu9ZMDPANHSGwqKlJ8kkTfoUCwVQ4k10powPrORmLPwjpXjciqPdQz3SjKEG3GbQJL9 YeQwJOzEDSrDTavXdi928gnCdhu0CmelWuE5FttBfOeYNG+J2R91b5yAniGIQlJt1Tf8 69Ha4VqwQtHl1irko2AgAAuQcTISDnNRWJKbMrj3qOu+uK//g4/psooaxzmqYYUXISXO 5tS6uCo4XXLB91hv981M3AsXAqYVdHscQrx5l55M9tn4kj1LoQriaQdO9y0afbLI881u JC9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aDPS+XgQ7hE35dLkgpgBaogFW2sWOGSB2/ljVEyiaXE=; b=ZETXojj/0+HQc5IqooKnxTJRAN0Che09uc4ENaKtK8Tjyl28jwbzRZ/Y7IogHqmlJC MxmzQXcR4ZpPOAe8ehn8lRh0uNYXr7rzj/FO68Pf0S923AmplAiUIc8Yiw1gpkM+2vfG QFPLtFFlrGjvdXK87U2K0/Gpj6kY3wWuiR/ckONZjz3aUoZOrfE809TIGT6+dcosJ/o5 94uny19yAKD4RaFXoVDYVPHd3jtm3kP3ZTZ2pKjhju1vjYpyW7INv1/5qOimkRR05q6o oiFFauVJWxosijLE9JIsofXEHigyS92VdFj8dht97z72DurYE5lKoWKyY18M86lBV0qD /mnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qgFKZFqV6NRF4OiLYE7XemDkyzyCX5NKut4CYrVFUvTtCZipG uSUoqHKyUF4tyu6XTngdx2g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5982:: with SMTP id l2mr17279489pji.18.1628369807552; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 13:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoboy.vegasvil.org ([2601:645:c000:2163:e2d5:5eff:fea5:802f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm16955974pgm.15.2021.08.07.13.56.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 07 Aug 2021 13:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 13:56:44 -0700 From: Richard Cochran To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes , Yangbo Lu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev, "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Mat Martineau , Matthieu Baerts , Shuah Khan , Michal Kubecek , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Rui Sousa , Sebastien Laveze Subject: Re: [net-next, v5, 02/11] ptp: support ptp physical/virtual clocks conversion Message-ID: <20210807205644.GD22362@hoboy.vegasvil.org> References: <20210630081202.4423-1-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <20210630081202.4423-3-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <87r1f6kqby.fsf@vcostago-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20210807142259.GB22362@hoboy.vegasvil.org> <20210807144332.szyazdfl42abwzmd@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210807144332.szyazdfl42abwzmd@skbuf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 05:43:32PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > 3. Let the vclocks hold a reference to the underlying posix dynamic clock. > > So even if the vclock holds a reference to the underlying POSIX clock, > that won't prevent the hardware driver from unbinding, and further > gettime() calls on the vclock from faulting, will it? Oh, your are right. The vclocks call the real PHC clock's methods directly, not through the posix dynamic clock layer. > What about: > > 4. Create a device link with the vclock being a consumer and the parent > clock being a supplier? This way, ptp_vclock_unregister() is > automatically called whenever (and before) ptp_clock_unregister() is. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/device_link.html Sounds promising. Thanks, Richard