Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2034134pxt; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 09:16:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQ3M9p++tBDqRvnRn3E17fM7ShjnAi7AUnBSgR73VIhW5tjNPCNbOvohssBb6tnYOSmc/m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:583:: with SMTP id v3mr25483iox.91.1628439388174; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 09:16:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628439388; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aAYSmt+2GOTHG4vF+aXR4CI9N3YYGUvrIFx9a9nYWyZRCEAPxCZNoDRhzLxfQtehBh pYuEVFEzWC3y+ickmakEj1O3Fko4gd7L5gHt+KYnmIp0NNf7mQOUw8lNS2nHkn1ptTcJ xTReEnXkplU1M7TQ636m9QrM6RBYq8GH0+XvjKK4PkIGFC68413R0BI/3ApQQD+w9o8s BfEUsCKqsSKo/XLD9uYfisIY6x3VduTvrYzZAbzYnXcI1PgEa07wLjvI6eqjX5GBlWmv ql/g25QlRWTsLL56dGp2JJFyFbTVSs3DWw15RsXGnJzsMHEzid9yTNSI7kfAz9CB9BOb tiKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=uECoTBVYVfbSCv7oGJ2T82KAjDkmdYiiMqFGohDfZYA=; b=0YbY6zWdgzzmUq8BirDSVr8oYZFTfkLp8CGnzhcgA1SpQKh9t5d4KGmpS6d6VSRuU4 t10/q4zGNmsjaC5605LjrSpFQCxf6o9V/PkAjwx/OixYF86FaJxIa9MZ9v+tyksfKUWB He+SNkqKSfUbUxJ1HbB+6vItQ81BfGyXhQUzEpvZ5te/ZEI/9nd8QP7UuaDs4WRQqbdL 3dd/shFkIUmZMUNaeviwm5vn4D5qEtEDx6wjaQKDJm9gDYdGHuxbCeSWRyP2Dtec2A/Q u3wfaq7uz2ZqWJSnt2k9j3SdHaFNq6+sSbuuz3mMhmUKvye3DTAkAkMJZhFUn2RXYqMs oYuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v20si13953475jas.98.2021.08.08.09.16.17; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 09:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231756AbhHHQPs (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 8 Aug 2021 12:15:48 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43358 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230049AbhHHQPp (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2021 12:15:45 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C6E31B; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 09:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8023F718; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 09:15:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Josh Triplett , Mathieu Desnoyers , Davidlohr Bueso , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , Anshuman Khandual , Vincenzo Frascino , Steven Price , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] sched: Introduce is_pcpu_safe() In-Reply-To: <800ff941e3ec86ea1397cddf8ecea3d4a17c55dc.camel@gmx.de> References: <20210807005807.1083943-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210807005807.1083943-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <800ff941e3ec86ea1397cddf8ecea3d4a17c55dc.camel@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 17:15:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6lrap5z.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/08/21 03:42, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2021-08-07 at 01:58 +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> >> +static inline bool is_pcpu_safe(void) > > Nit: seems odd to avoid spelling it out to save two characters, percpu > is word like, rolls off the ole tongue better than p-c-p-u. > > -Mike True. A quick grep says both versions are used, though "percpu" wins by about a factor of 2. I'll tweak that for a v3.