Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:59:11 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To:     Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>
cc:     Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED][REGRESSION] 5.10.56 longterm kernel breakage on
 m68k/aranym
In-Reply-To: <CAM43=SNV4016i2ByssN9tvXDN6ZyQiYM218_NkrebyPA=p6Rcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <380dd57-4b60-ac9c-508c-826d8ec1b0aa@linux-m68k.org>
References: <CAM43=SM4KFE8C1ekwiw_kBYZKSwycnTYcbBXfw5OhUn4h=r9YA@mail.gmail.com> <31298797-f791-4ac5-cfda-c95d7c7958a4@linux-m68k.org> <CAM43=SNV4016i2ByssN9tvXDN6ZyQiYM218_NkrebyPA=p6Rcg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Mikael Pettersson wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 1:20 AM Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >
> > > I updated the 5.10 longterm kernel on one of my m68k/aranym VMs from
> > > 5.10.47 to 5.10.56, and the new kernel failed to boot:
> > >
> > > ARAnyM 1.1.0
> > > Using config file: 'aranym1.headless.config'
> > > Could not open joystick 0
> > > ARAnyM RTC Timer: /dev/rtc: Permission denied
> > > ARAnyM LILO: Error loading ramdisk 'root.bin'
> > > Blitter tried to read byte from register ff8a00 at 0077ee
> > >
> > > At this point it kept running, but produced no output to the console,
> > > and would never get to the point of starting user-space. Attaching gdb
> > > to aranym showed nothing interesting, i.e. it seemed to be executing
> > > normally.
> > >
> > > A git bisect identified the following commit between 5.10.52 and
> > > 5.10.53 as the culprit:
> > > # first bad commit: [9e1cf2d1ed37c934c9935f2c0b2f8b15d9355654]
> > > mm/userfaultfd: fix uffd-wp special cases for fork()
> > >
> >
> > That commit appeared in mainline between v5.13 and v5.14-rc1. Is mainline
> > also affected? e.g. v5.14-rc4.
> 
> 5.14-rc4 boots fine. I suspect the commit has some dependency that
> hasn't been backported to 5.10 stable.
> 

On mainline, 9e1cf2d1ed3 is known as commit 8f34f1eac382 ("mm/userfaultfd: 
fix uffd-wp special cases for fork()").

There are differences between the two commits that may be relevant. I 
don't know.

If you checkout 8f34f1eac382 and if that works, it would indicate either 
missing dependencies in -stable, or those differences are important.

OTOH, if 8f34f1eac382 fails in the same way as linux-5.10.y, it would 
indicate that -stable is missing a fix that's present in v5.14-rc4.