Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:11:38 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@intel.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kishon <kishon@ti.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
        "kris.pan@linux.intel.com" <kris.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        "Zhou, Furong" <furong.zhou@intel.com>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        "Vaidya, Mahesh R" <mahesh.r.vaidya@intel.com>,
        "Srikandan, Nandhini" <nandhini.srikandan@intel.com>,
        "Demakkanavar, Kenchappa" <kenchappa.demakkanavar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC
 support to the arasan eMMC driver
Message-ID: <YRDqQvKQ71/824Lu@matsya>
References: <20210730063309.8194-1-rashmi.a@intel.com>
 <20210730063309.8194-3-rashmi.a@intel.com>
 <CAPDyKFqZ-H3+OnYyyY7y611YrRAAMFq+W65DMfM4wSNvY_fzjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <MWHPR11MB17891909766F5295AF34B0578CF69@MWHPR11MB1789.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB17891909766F5295AF34B0578CF69@MWHPR11MB1789.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 09-08-21, 05:16, A, Rashmi wrote:

> > 
> > Rashmi, is it safe to apply this separately from the phy driver/dt changes?
> > Then I can queue this via my mmc tree, if you like.
> No, the phy driver/dt changes must go together with "mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver" patch.

Why is that?

What could happen, emmc driver will complain about phy not found and
bail right?

-- 
~Vinod