Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2524606pxt; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 02:34:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5W+tR+0dvDlr4he6edYjCqO53qc6loM8dwYNMEFul3ndBheQF+22iTtH2fffughZsktZD X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f919:: with SMTP id j25mr235008iog.2.1628501693262; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 02:34:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628501693; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BGVTKJPXcaLPYjAUMicJ9t4eM+Pz2u+vOtDUVn1rhzjtxinGPqacMbrGxAo7Qp65Cc 0TJAQ+2fyB+xarjqHzRBHroQfg/ZS2FBaKLKZcH+0ceFkAteOGSbNlOZnRRCo7pFWS7L iiYMQVUDbhYEO1mFsg4UetKxrEi0J8UZKt6tGEQZVM8F3mLJ4Mx+xOHas/xqMartgZe1 D2NbXMLR4Nh8CjxGbI8gdlgIfxufjJzZ9ZZT2lDaPXaZxlQZrR03KcBeqiFeO3jXBNzX yRQ/TIiNWxppWuQkDPtKX5Ji3zBU6gbsDjRGw612693q00Z3Tqb7a6/Eov69x9VLFbja tlWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=EAGRf1Et+tzYsN6U73rPfAHcBkVggeZ8F78bJocYRo4=; b=uXIpMIwX01VWAM4kSTOsnAOWdjG3wOhNy/7ujH2YgXC+Am0mrypT3+wWzP2X2qj8AL EceLb8XYyT+7jSs7lXJG/sfuEo6HqnkKhioACcO8H7/anD/KScNnAGFhah0Q7745yPm2 mIQE/M/Et0QbGjl45Dgz1v5dSLutRhDRBU+ehacDyGAniXqgT/y0JbAmjoAZS3RNcSjJ zy+vndZ0S3tQ63yDrs5PogZ4nHoXswWRznPLzWqme5r8OrR6Y/Y7F6pyXyTZ3fsth1sy uc5OmHvJ/lhExQrlWpV7Un2xQrmJ52TZbPrra/XT0AaTzNO1CpAUhDMuhP9vY/F0sVFw NfQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r28si18415913jap.117.2021.08.09.02.34.39; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 02:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234559AbhHIJct (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:49 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:8384 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234347AbhHIJcs (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:32:48 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GjrNv5rTZz85Yj; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:28:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:32:27 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (10.175.113.25) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:32:26 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: , , , , , , CC: , , , Kefeng Wang Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] vmalloc: Choose a better start address in vm_area_register_early() Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:37:48 +0800 Message-ID: <20210809093750.131091-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210809093750.131091-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20210809093750.131091-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.25] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There are some fixed locations in the vmalloc area be reserved in ARM(see iotable_init()) and ARM64(see map_kernel()), but for pcpu_page_first_chunk(), it calls vm_area_register_early() and choose VMALLOC_START as the start address of vmap area which could be conflicted with above address, then could trigger a BUG_ON in vm_area_add_early(). Let's choose the end of existing address range in vmlist as the start address instead of VMALLOC_START to avoid the BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang --- mm/vmalloc.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index d5cd52805149..1e8fe08725b8 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2238,11 +2238,17 @@ void __init vm_area_add_early(struct vm_struct *vm) */ void __init vm_area_register_early(struct vm_struct *vm, size_t align) { - static size_t vm_init_off __initdata; - unsigned long addr; - - addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START + vm_init_off, align); - vm_init_off = PFN_ALIGN(addr + vm->size) - VMALLOC_START; + struct vm_struct *head = vmlist, *curr, *next; + unsigned long addr = ALIGN(VMALLOC_START, align); + + while (head != NULL) { + next = head->next; + curr = head; + head = next; + addr = ALIGN((unsigned long)curr->addr + curr->size, align); + if (next && (unsigned long)next->addr - addr > vm->size) + break; + } vm->addr = (void *)addr; -- 2.26.2