Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 20:13:48 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd:
 Document RZ/G2L SoC
Message-ID: <20210809181348.w64v6dryf7qlill5@pengutronix.de>
References: <20210727133022.634-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20210727133022.634-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20210809132605.m76mnxkp6bdcn77c@pengutronix.de>
 <CA+V-a8uDPn83W6wi2Jq8VFrBeGSVMPMiFmXGV2z=L8xxZteFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="72xgtvpkmtrh6noj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8uDPn83W6wi2Jq8VFrBeGSVMPMiFmXGV2z=L8xxZteFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--72xgtvpkmtrh6noj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09.08.2021 16:48:20, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > +    interrupt-names:
> > > +      items:
> > > +        - const: ch_int
> > > +        - const: g_int
> >
> > Are you adding the new interrupt-names to the existing DTs, too?
> > Otherwise this patch will generate more warnings in the existing DTs.
> >
> For non RZ/G2L family interrupt-names property is not marked as
> required property so dtbs_check won't complain. Once we have added
> interrupt names in all the SoC DTSI's we will mark it as required
> property for the rest of the SoC's.

That makes sense! Thanks for the explanation.

regards,
Marc

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

--72xgtvpkmtrh6noj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEK3kIWJt9yTYMP3ehqclaivrt76kFAmERcFkACgkQqclaivrt
76nhoQf/YSZrrJlQSc6xA1DIfF9Xf3lM4xEP4c2GLVkZ80rSvPtqpWyxJSZQhXcC
Z6eSYnmrcO6idAF4JvZKE9TgwYwHdnCtTSE3DxlHrcqcWnMYHwSkpwrlb5C4uaqK
TK8AqbC1UeHG1kycIx36l3rsXrDAweEALgh4CHE2ozyUhJEVUurPCDjECBpHpuAN
VSWwiFSgfK9/aXzD/s6/4//CEeJh0cBpNWVvyAlYo92Wv+W1q63/jbJJFtWNDl/G
kwB2FMk+vvYDHbLThauRZJIVlO2P5JLgLYPt/iJ9h7Vjw0XU/dg2vp3FqAqM9VmZ
Mmc2g1OppHVtjYZZGYlfD03jYVzpGg==
=M9dG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--72xgtvpkmtrh6noj--