Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2949908pxt; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyeXjcAeLVtAwkAaSVA7vlRX2TI+elWW6oSKhgSJfKJVzhy8ZedQhKkvDv+jBmUZ8v3B2r X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:386:: with SMTP id o6mr32079400edv.294.1628538670821; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:51:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628538670; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u4UgsyTaxVnrCHaMnm8TTiVa4fhmCnhl4sJXC/ZdbQmCr+lh5aXhrWqHfYUZrcxlmx VH1YnNbcjKG9tBG2aUt015wvAg8NPNMhG+W2AC+AcsVflEWo0L9LJMp3A+WOd2yHafR0 VwZx8VuKXae9LFy1KL3FvjMp9SWOwHha2wZ5HJcBe14FBVliL2be75LKyKXQid8mQ60i IrfNjg28G3h6a1uoI7+wCd4k/2CUd6owE98UlhW0w4kyVvvjsgD8thKKLvEGD2jS8cY9 /yMcNRBg/pNCUNH7AmmmPqFiLBbWQQZgEaqI/Tcx2qj700RO6bQTOKU2Tv8ez2sdGxyN UiRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+SX/dKCltSMDTui64J3aycJEZiA5M6DDMBziRG3rh0s=; b=DbEXbuve5LpXXCsld94z7NIrUBHz7yMnw7dAqbIR6IaaqYDXKrQWfBbkPY1O4EvTZL 7TMLkWTogX3nr1Bza0ok0o4pVoYONP2WN/N5k0KLEQXxQr0DcQj6uFTxZ+In0310CF/M QocQHb4i1jXDrgZWW7w+YfSirHqq+VzKRdfno9PFmML7k5CgtfdIfHYyVQFQqZcvvvqD D7ljAZKN7ourlaTYgucuGttcd0VUtxpI1PMa9PjOjmisq/Bm5a1g0G13bfxLy9E+p0Lz Wg+xSyzsXNtXtjftYIGzsHqO3yCk6mnuC7SP7ygGtC+gXzGdS7BVGt5/FPVKxkIdqT+T nHPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e25si16971199edq.335.2021.08.09.12.50.47; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232913AbhHIQb0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:31:26 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:60688 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232887AbhHIQbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B8521EB5; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7199C13AC8; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id +4SvC0VYEWEbTwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 16:31:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:30:57 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf/bench-futex: Factor out futex_flag Message-ID: <20210809163057.no4icet42g6vu6uo@offworld> References: <20210809043301.66002-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20210809043301.66002-4-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20201120 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 09 Aug 2021, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >Wouldn't be better to have it defined in one place and then in futex.h >just have a 'extern int futex_flag;' declaration? Sure. > >I applied the first two patches already. Ok so I'm clear, this one just won't get picked up right now then. (you don't want me to respin this patch then in a form v3, right?) Thanks, Davidlohr