Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2950359pxt; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ/g1Ytb8agnDylRtuTzDWGumDwsHJou5bFsAh9YNFEVPRwm8ON5dhgd+ny1UOifTgapm1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8152:: with SMTP id z18mr24531114ejw.419.1628538728023; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628538728; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GxDtCmKo/igKI8f+2moYbRMPMp8yhjw51bZ/DCOp3OjgMKPW8l0cS2RTzhQjLYWBtP LfpjZGcIQl86MvMZTSP8L7OFbFYS6AmpkZbf8oQsmcWs6iAqceZhkHpYlXceNcGiD/ms QMBCI1Amc3yDzsWwdH+2E6VEq/l4KxdwSHOFSqAApvvRJD5pVZnv6SDZegOAbxr+UrZp M1dQrT07n/JMficYx58KqITnyy4VlPmYrBF3vmRSkAoItAhhM28bZDyTR0L5cMTlgtCn lJ18Gcu/dMekoJW62nMnuLpThYJu2LJLYWZqkJ4z68MzxuIQvqoyFRUCI+fr+ef3Qy2N PPUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=zbZ84dUruMpwe3ieB49KABKh56f8lv6vClYn02HWm84=; b=TKnWfMUvljHfN2NaP5bdhhnrgBaiUPXvzUFHQ5YSaxQDDUBmyXnVdJz6ySUcw7w3nw edq6xFSCmPkhwbUaXB6IJCTVTmKdeKuiCB+prjq85GgYWVZ4ufndmFwnEXwczDCgKOqF 8a3Y4zlbxzu2zUR11elnyFfPyLBZaCBf6zVtGVaPDSKrDtEDMkIrIggqGUYsx+nIc+qU L3+iz3f8EnX3WfqiwjRX/Y7jvii1uC0TRlTkpM9i8FS6Upl2GEXnGPjGy/0/GB3mhlWx uWHlS+AdGhOJEaDZsFYhZXW//qVNNEZl7JNwoxe4qMEskdntH44n0sKwlt20VSARMOOy Z7/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w18si15279192edd.285.2021.08.09.12.51.45; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232384AbhHIQVM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:21:12 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:50344 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232874AbhHIQUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:20:18 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10070"; a="201899277" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,307,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="201899277" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2021 09:19:41 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,307,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="588935639" Received: from mdroper-desk1.fm.intel.com (HELO mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.1.27.134]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2021 09:19:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:19:39 -0700 From: Matt Roper To: Joonas Lahtinen , DRI , Intel Graphics , Jani Nikula , Rodrigo Vivi , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-intel tree Message-ID: <20210809161939.GS1556418@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20210715141854.1ad4a956@canb.auug.org.au> <162823181614.15830.10618174106053255881@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:36:56AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Always use the dim tooling when applying patches, it will do the right > > thing with regards to adding the S-o-b. > > fd.o server rejects any pushes that haven't been done by dim, so how did > this get through? I definitely used dim for all of these patches, but I'm not sure how I lost my s-o-b on this one. Maybe when I edited the commit message after 'dim extract-tags' I accidentally deleted an extra line when I removed the extract-tags marker? It's the only patch where the line is missing, so it's almost certainly human error on my part rather than something dim did wrong. > Matt, can you pls figure out and type up the patch to > plug that hole? Are you referring to a patch for dim here? The i915 patch has already landed, so we can't change its commit message now. Matt > > Thanks, Daniel > > > > > Regards, Joonas > > > > Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-07-15 07:18:54) > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Commit > > > > > > db47fe727e1f ("drm/i915/step: s/_revid_tbl/_revids") > > > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Stephen Rothwell > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Matt Roper Graphics Software Engineer VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement Intel Corporation (916) 356-2795