Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759229AbWK3Jdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:33:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759232AbWK3Jdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:33:35 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:65205 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759229AbWK3Jde (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:33:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:33:29 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Wenji Wu Cc: David Miller , akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP Message-ID: <20061130093329.GA4645@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Wenji Wu , David Miller , akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <2f14bf623344.456de60a@fnal.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2f14bf623344.456de60a@fnal.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 663 Lines: 11 On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:56:58PM -0600, Wenji Wu wrote: > Yes, when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, the "problem" won't happen. That is why I put "for 2.6 desktop, low-latency desktop" in the uploaded paper. This "problem" happens in the 2.6 Desktop and Low-latency Desktop. CONFIG_PREEMPT is only for people that are in for the feeling. There is no real world advtantage to it and we should probably remove it again. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/