Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp3748688pxt; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:23:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziLxmmPE5fwtE8rhPReQFEJ+Qu/Z/ya6fpIovjDgsfPWIRPmXA0HZq0Nbi0hXG5/iFxJpl X-Received: by 2002:a5d:80d1:: with SMTP id h17mr950071ior.71.1628616199014; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:23:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628616199; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yqVqNXR9drkIRn4i60Ui9q4a+q2TzyWAit5Bzf2FbRxjECnHXO2Ly+vA29KcPDDqXB vjAQjacXTCMqh2FRPKUp7/K3U0C8geZBtiQCcPnkl6YUaSsATWSPvjrquCiXRB4pcVUr PErOVbSY2L7RFoJcrRVAOuSNewZjVptaqPLkfSSvUp19n/zblFOFZuEFOyk54puhcno/ 9lX5pw0/4E5KBPWSNczvLotLEHM3HsjjXzZ2RHTXwUPHPDKnUueDxh8pCGjcV26LrRHh +T9O4A4WTXCnkoWj8zAehjzgs4MGKjsYw4hadgUpzMPJl7cqLV0tOVJywkqtLZwFFQOl q38Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=K4ptm+rdNSJqAUHlyhWBawRV8GOSw2P2heFN7xwzD2E=; b=m0yGkGEbRGZzbTJ1RgxEX9dq2tpXnI31mDFHVBoYqtWcR2VjY5oEA4a/5VmVodRODx 1ZX/VisEm+Xg1mzlr+JRq+bNcsGcrr5SPsyA++fV1CC1lWYo++uVc00Ufj9MtH7bBs54 H07FyuQHAbtS6CwzBnmlT4PENi5ACTCEQaXcI76Bb9nBIxQwO3d4QKyJTEr62a7phH9y YhqGeONH98a9hn1EDneCN67VVj9OL+5+AfB0IPLJ1FWgaxjfw4KBYY0ja0poh4NZjiPm zqI02gaxt/nMFQq89MCD5R3L4w6b/lGhgaPwyhBxSB3Z7sI2pSh8mwWgJVnwAEqRxfjb ueKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b4si8132013ile.87.2021.08.10.10.23.02; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233968AbhHJKah (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 06:30:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53188 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231688AbhHJKac (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 06:30:32 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2EC6D; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.9.181] (unknown [10.57.9.181]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB6B33F70D; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] cpufreq: vexpress: Use auto-registration for energy model To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Vincent Donnefort , Sudeep Holla , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <87fecd84e3f6ff6f153be14b0d53de93c0b04ae6.1628579170.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:30:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87fecd84e3f6ff6f153be14b0d53de93c0b04ae6.1628579170.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/10/21 8:36 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Use the CPUFREQ_REGISTER_WITH_EM flag to allow cpufreq core to > automatically register with the energy model. > > This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver and fixes the > unregistration part as well. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c > index 51dfa9ae6cf5..28c4c3254337 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c > @@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > policy->freq_table = freq_table[cur_cluster]; > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000; /* 1 ms */ > > - dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus); > - > if (is_bL_switching_enabled()) > per_cpu(cpu_last_req_freq, policy->cpu) = > clk_get_cpu_rate(policy->cpu); > @@ -487,7 +485,8 @@ static void ve_spc_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > static struct cpufreq_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_driver = { > .name = "vexpress-spc", > .flags = CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY | > - CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK, > + CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK | > + CPUFREQ_REGISTER_WITH_EM, > .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, > .target_index = ve_spc_cpufreq_set_target, > .get = ve_spc_cpufreq_get_rate, > With the change for patch 1/8 the we discussed below this patch 8/8, it LGTM Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba