Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp3912844pxt; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:36:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvGLLPVHdqEaTdpvtHnYsQzUflijQhyPwuXOe6/SuMISsjLloO7hhuTkE7DR1+RWCOKHjo X-Received: by 2002:a02:5bca:: with SMTP id g193mr28726225jab.129.1628631395111; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:36:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628631395; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OolWSFMC7JxBAkOgIpJDJVrE/5ElMBN6CfseZblMxxKA0zmLEmUufVCVcHe056Pmqc zBDmbf4HPfD8xT7BDCR3esSwMqxxYl72XizsY7chGEKLuuD+TH/JzgU5Y+1b06mFpcBf oVDRHwi3OijC8vh+ER3Y9wxFOtcAqDoYgkbcNMTTX3xSAxYNmB1mt6Qd27dRQcmfJBn9 Nyu+ASZ3mEa7fhZ63tgUdUbiP+SC0EfE9A9AJ57ftFUjnDXysOhWHzORxP9c8OUrbLau OYt9jeXPxyexdG4goZtWUE+63OfhCdDjnCsEucVK77NO1oiqeQM20lLK+U6a9OfEW7KP 4S6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=owlKubz0VCC0V3BG8kdaZ1xrau2d//hIlJnyfzapz+s=; b=DPKnUT7AS0cKz/74b7YmlT0xShS86j0mpeOjFRaHUGSvBCdhs8NG4nzZSGLCgGNvmf hDwCby92hLzAZ9toOI/6H4JhzmvVXynGUjbPJB2rd5AzHZoenrGrYwnoKVK3HesT91Lw Wr7Oawpq56pdnXPQaMolwtzinNpIaR0QzmObVPUb8u64ct/gq57Bvptd0Ig6BdGm2lpF Y3rTKcEWGYWUIoE/3Db5JsiUGEK+TSamo1G7cQgVsWf+05m3eT7VpyAcf41P9y9X+ryT rMWbkJcbs7ZaO8qtZc8t1zrQGp5RJqqw0qSQ2jwt0xrzgXegPCtyQZll2KRDRyIrEOUE 8YSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AEKpi0uI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n8si11155744iob.69.2021.08.10.14.36.24; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AEKpi0uI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234632AbhHJVfl (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:35:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234652AbhHJVfg (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:35:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB53C0613D3 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id z9-20020a9d62c90000b0290462f0ab0800so773393otk.11 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:35:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=owlKubz0VCC0V3BG8kdaZ1xrau2d//hIlJnyfzapz+s=; b=AEKpi0uIg7pyzBo4tSSu7frvNA2UyvuApWtvuMkpMkS7yaSyheLEb8zHuLNCITXFla bd9U5QSV+e9gdMv6FTgDM7FASRqfmv5ikOgOz2NmRNNIuRZifJmnnbGTa13+WIvf/h7d R0WP/4+s7/b4QG66dz/cEsSjmT37QecCQMknjaaOMs3ysZbOEEg6vChNkEYJGXmHYY3U j2iPyWAxEZRBkjaO2/loDu/EPj4LRJSXQRZAEV2Vkjc2sESwf+Sxfg/DWPT97dz1PzgO rbLe8Pjrp48llIKFJYzrGYOvnvfiMtQ1UKHtDfokSRUFUpQbNCuHV/swmHhrgqmvtSdz sXZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=owlKubz0VCC0V3BG8kdaZ1xrau2d//hIlJnyfzapz+s=; b=Kozs9xp23LR3Vgfzdem4VneufiWEEIiF4/9h9yk02O9cxP1rINjP4bA3xoG0uYeiyx FAElSOkgsfqShwanykGXwVPIgEgD4CJ+fNj8bvVjiL9eyw6jqrqa+/X1T5bJ7AcKhNXD HJCPavGF7R6LAM/kNY0po3ix+IroQVToLuMe1Kat1I4fNXRgSAy9CN2896aduYcIOn6Z 1YHvr/E+QlZ2SGuIDvk7PaQoqJfpHzxtfPLJ6xm41nV7wU+5HjlDyXE31t9VR4NIrBKT hYWPePnfVckR1dL887cBsdgpY8WCJ8cOjuQDJ/MQPKhfH1Ew+zHBXsMFXULLEOkKp+L9 EHOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TLq09J677qlcLtjKN/rJBeylVfi62culu7vDc6YtYb7m94iRZ iNZh6pAP4a+0przvTXj7dWJc/w== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5d14:: with SMTP id b20mr23125580oti.307.1628631308088; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ripple.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 45sm295805otm.43.2021.08.10.14.35.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@ripple.anvils To: Feng Tang cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Dave Hansen , Ben Widawsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Mike Kravetz , Randy Dunlap , Vlastimil Babka , Andi Kleen , Dan Williams , ying.huang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] mm/hugetlb: add support for mempolicy MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY In-Reply-To: <20210810085048.GA67328@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> Message-ID: <81f33a1-8ff-f2d4-63ff-de6c81d86f3@google.com> References: <1627970362-61305-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <1627970362-61305-4-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <20210809024430.GA46432@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20210809123747.GB46432@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20210810085048.GA67328@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Feng Tang wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:19:32PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [snip] > > > > Do you think you can provide same helpers for other policies as well? > > > > Maybe we can get rid of some other ifdefery as well. > > > > > > Sure. I can make separate patch(es) for that. > > > > > > And you mean helper like mpol_is_bind/default/local/preferred? > > > > > > I just run 'git-grep MPOL', and for places using "mode == MPOL_XXX", > > > mostly they are in mempolicy.[ch], the only another place is in > > > shmem.c, do we need to create all the helpers for it and the > > > potential future users? > > > > I would just go with those instances which need to ifdef for NUMA. > > Thanks! > > Yes, following is a patch to remove one CONFIG_NUMA check, though > an bolder idea to extend the patch by removing the CONFIG_TMPFS > check in the same line. > > Thanks, > Feng > > ---------8<--------------------------------- > > From 1a5858721ac8ce99c27c13d310bba2983dc73d97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Feng Tang > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:00:59 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] mm: shmem: avoid open coded check for mempolicy's mode > > Add a mempolicy helper to do the check, which can also remove > a CONFIG_NUMA option check. > > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang No thanks: this is not an improvement. The "#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_TMPFS)" is there to eliminate dead code that would not be automatically eliminated by the optimizer: it's not there just to avoid MPOL_DEFAULT, and it's there to cover shmem_get_sbmpol() along with shmem_show_mpol(). I know we tend to avoid #ifdefs in .c files, and that's good; and I know you could find other code in mm/shmem.c which might also be #ifdef'ed to eliminate other dead code in other configs; but unless there's a new drive to purge our .c source of all #ifdefs, please just leave this as is. Thanks, Hugh > --- > include/linux/mempolicy.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > mm/shmem.c | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h > index 60d5e6c3340c..8fc518ad4f3c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h > +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h > @@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ static inline bool mpol_is_preferred_many(struct mempolicy *pol) > return (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY); > } > > +static inline bool mpol_is_default(struct mempolicy *pol) > +{ > + return (pol->mode == MPOL_DEFAULT); > +} > > #else > > @@ -287,6 +291,10 @@ static inline int mpol_parse_str(char *str, struct mempolicy **mpol) > } > #endif > > +static inline void mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct mempolicy *pol) > +{ > +} > + > static inline int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > unsigned long address) > { > @@ -309,5 +317,11 @@ static inline bool mpol_is_preferred_many(struct mempolicy *pol) > return false; > } > > +static inline bool mpol_is_default(struct mempolicy *pol) > +{ > + return false; > +} > + > + > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ > #endif > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c > index 96f05f6af8bb..26b195209ef7 100644 > --- a/mm/shmem.c > +++ b/mm/shmem.c > @@ -1437,12 +1437,12 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc) > return 0; > } > > -#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_TMPFS) > +#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS > static void shmem_show_mpol(struct seq_file *seq, struct mempolicy *mpol) > { > char buffer[64]; > > - if (!mpol || mpol->mode == MPOL_DEFAULT) > + if (!mpol || mpol_is_default(mpol)) > return; /* show nothing */ > > mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer), mpol); > @@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ static struct mempolicy *shmem_get_sbmpol(struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo) > } > return mpol; > } > -#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA || !CONFIG_TMPFS */ > +#else /* !CONFIG_TMPFS */ > static inline void shmem_show_mpol(struct seq_file *seq, struct mempolicy *mpol) > { > } > @@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ static inline struct mempolicy *shmem_get_sbmpol(struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo) > { > return NULL; > } > -#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA && CONFIG_TMPFS */ > +#endif /* CONFIG_TMPFS */ > #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA > #define vm_policy vm_private_data > #endif > -- > 2.14.1